Justin T. Kautz, B. Mullins, R. Baldwin, S. Graham
{"title":"一种适用于无线传感器网络的节能介质访问控制协议","authors":"Justin T. Kautz, B. Mullins, R. Baldwin, S. Graham","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2007.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a medium access control protocol for wireless sensor networks (WSN) called adaptive sensor medium access control (AMAC), which is based on the sensor medium access control (S-MAC) protocol. Since WSNs are energy constrained, the lifetime of the network must be increased by making it as energy efficient as possible. Whereas S-MAC uses a fixed duty cycle for sleeping, AMAC adapts to traffic conditions by incorporating multiple duty cycles. Under a high traffic load, AMAC has a short duty cycle and awakes more often. Under a low traffic load, AMAC has a longer duty cycle and awakes infrequently. The AMAC protocol is simulated in OPNET Modeler. Analysis indicates that AMAC uses 15% less power and 22% less energy cost per byte than S-MAC with a tradeoff in twice the latency. For an application insensitive to latency, the AMAC protocol offers an extended lifetime","PeriodicalId":208451,"journal":{"name":"2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Adaptable Energy-Efficient Medium Access Control Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks\",\"authors\":\"Justin T. Kautz, B. Mullins, R. Baldwin, S. Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.2007.59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose a medium access control protocol for wireless sensor networks (WSN) called adaptive sensor medium access control (AMAC), which is based on the sensor medium access control (S-MAC) protocol. Since WSNs are energy constrained, the lifetime of the network must be increased by making it as energy efficient as possible. Whereas S-MAC uses a fixed duty cycle for sleeping, AMAC adapts to traffic conditions by incorporating multiple duty cycles. Under a high traffic load, AMAC has a short duty cycle and awakes more often. Under a low traffic load, AMAC has a longer duty cycle and awakes infrequently. The AMAC protocol is simulated in OPNET Modeler. Analysis indicates that AMAC uses 15% less power and 22% less energy cost per byte than S-MAC with a tradeoff in twice the latency. For an application insensitive to latency, the AMAC protocol offers an extended lifetime\",\"PeriodicalId\":208451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Adaptable Energy-Efficient Medium Access Control Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
We propose a medium access control protocol for wireless sensor networks (WSN) called adaptive sensor medium access control (AMAC), which is based on the sensor medium access control (S-MAC) protocol. Since WSNs are energy constrained, the lifetime of the network must be increased by making it as energy efficient as possible. Whereas S-MAC uses a fixed duty cycle for sleeping, AMAC adapts to traffic conditions by incorporating multiple duty cycles. Under a high traffic load, AMAC has a short duty cycle and awakes more often. Under a low traffic load, AMAC has a longer duty cycle and awakes infrequently. The AMAC protocol is simulated in OPNET Modeler. Analysis indicates that AMAC uses 15% less power and 22% less energy cost per byte than S-MAC with a tradeoff in twice the latency. For an application insensitive to latency, the AMAC protocol offers an extended lifetime