基于随机局部搜索的紧负载均衡

P. Berenbrink, Peter Kling, Christopher Liaw, Abbas Mehrabian
{"title":"基于随机局部搜索的紧负载均衡","authors":"P. Berenbrink, Peter Kling, Christopher Liaw, Abbas Mehrabian","doi":"10.1109/IPDPS.2017.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the following balls-into-bins process with n bins andmballs: Each ball is equipped with a mutually independent exponential clock of rate 1. Whenever a ball’s clock rings, the ball samples a random bin and moves there if the number of balls in the sampled bin is smaller than in its current bin. This simple process models a typical load balancing problem where users (balls) seek a selfish improvement of their assignment to resources (bins). From a game theoretic perspective, this is a randomized approach to the well-known KPmodel [1], while it is known as Randomized Local Search (RLS) in load balancing literature [2], [3]. Up to now, the best bound on the expected time to reach perfect balance was O((ln n)2+ln(n)⋅n 2/m) due to [3]. We improve this to an asymptotically tight O(ln(n)+n2/m). Our analysis is based on the crucial observation that performing destructive moves (reversals of RLS moves) cannot decrease the balancing time. This allows us to simplify problem instances and to ignore “inconvenient moves” in the analysis.","PeriodicalId":209524,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tight Load Balancing Via Randomized Local Search\",\"authors\":\"P. Berenbrink, Peter Kling, Christopher Liaw, Abbas Mehrabian\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPDPS.2017.52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider the following balls-into-bins process with n bins andmballs: Each ball is equipped with a mutually independent exponential clock of rate 1. Whenever a ball’s clock rings, the ball samples a random bin and moves there if the number of balls in the sampled bin is smaller than in its current bin. This simple process models a typical load balancing problem where users (balls) seek a selfish improvement of their assignment to resources (bins). From a game theoretic perspective, this is a randomized approach to the well-known KPmodel [1], while it is known as Randomized Local Search (RLS) in load balancing literature [2], [3]. Up to now, the best bound on the expected time to reach perfect balance was O((ln n)2+ln(n)⋅n 2/m) due to [3]. We improve this to an asymptotically tight O(ln(n)+n2/m). Our analysis is based on the crucial observation that performing destructive moves (reversals of RLS moves) cannot decrease the balancing time. This allows us to simplify problem instances and to ignore “inconvenient moves” in the analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":209524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS.2017.52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS.2017.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

我们考虑以下有n个箱子和球的球入箱过程:每个球配备一个速率为1的相互独立的指数时钟。每当一个球的时钟响起时,这个球就会对一个随机的球仓进行采样,如果采样的球仓中的球数少于当前的球仓,它就会移动到那里。这个简单的过程模拟了一个典型的负载平衡问题,其中用户(球)寻求对资源(箱)分配的自私改进。从博弈论的角度来看,这是一种众所周知的KPmodel的随机化方法[1],而在负载均衡文献[2],[3]中,它被称为随机局部搜索(RLS)。由于[3]的原因,到目前为止,达到完美平衡的期望时间的最佳界为O((ln n)2+ln(n)·n 2/m)。我们将其改进为渐近紧密的O(ln(n)+n2/m)我们的分析是基于关键的观察,即执行破坏性移动(RLS移动的逆转)不能减少平衡时间。这允许我们简化问题实例并忽略分析中的“不方便的移动”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tight Load Balancing Via Randomized Local Search
We consider the following balls-into-bins process with n bins andmballs: Each ball is equipped with a mutually independent exponential clock of rate 1. Whenever a ball’s clock rings, the ball samples a random bin and moves there if the number of balls in the sampled bin is smaller than in its current bin. This simple process models a typical load balancing problem where users (balls) seek a selfish improvement of their assignment to resources (bins). From a game theoretic perspective, this is a randomized approach to the well-known KPmodel [1], while it is known as Randomized Local Search (RLS) in load balancing literature [2], [3]. Up to now, the best bound on the expected time to reach perfect balance was O((ln n)2+ln(n)⋅n 2/m) due to [3]. We improve this to an asymptotically tight O(ln(n)+n2/m). Our analysis is based on the crucial observation that performing destructive moves (reversals of RLS moves) cannot decrease the balancing time. This allows us to simplify problem instances and to ignore “inconvenient moves” in the analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信