{"title":"中国实用新型专利:垃圾还是宝藏——基于数据的分析","authors":"Binqiang Liu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2418540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Chinese Utility Model Patent (CUMP) has existed since the implementation of China’s Patent Law in 1985. Previous studies on the CUMP focus on the patentability standards (subject matter, novelty, and non-obviousness), and the nature of the system itself. Data-based empirical studies are not often seen. This paper fills this gap by analyzing the CUMP from the data perspectives of citation, litigation, and finance. Derived conclusions show the growing importance of the CUMP, and its high value, as a treasure to CUMP holders, contrary to the traditional misconception that the CUMP is trash.","PeriodicalId":125544,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China Utility Model Patent: Trash or Treasure – A Data-Based Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Binqiang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2418540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Chinese Utility Model Patent (CUMP) has existed since the implementation of China’s Patent Law in 1985. Previous studies on the CUMP focus on the patentability standards (subject matter, novelty, and non-obviousness), and the nature of the system itself. Data-based empirical studies are not often seen. This paper fills this gap by analyzing the CUMP from the data perspectives of citation, litigation, and finance. Derived conclusions show the growing importance of the CUMP, and its high value, as a treasure to CUMP holders, contrary to the traditional misconception that the CUMP is trash.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2418540\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2418540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
China Utility Model Patent: Trash or Treasure – A Data-Based Analysis
The Chinese Utility Model Patent (CUMP) has existed since the implementation of China’s Patent Law in 1985. Previous studies on the CUMP focus on the patentability standards (subject matter, novelty, and non-obviousness), and the nature of the system itself. Data-based empirical studies are not often seen. This paper fills this gap by analyzing the CUMP from the data perspectives of citation, litigation, and finance. Derived conclusions show the growing importance of the CUMP, and its high value, as a treasure to CUMP holders, contrary to the traditional misconception that the CUMP is trash.