消去屈和阿拉伯语的问题状态和最近争论的讨论

M. Sartori
{"title":"消去屈和阿拉伯语的问题状态和最近争论的讨论","authors":"M. Sartori","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvcm4f7q.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to draw up the statement with respect to the inflectional endings with regard to Arabic. To do this, it first addresses the phenomenon of belief that can take on the ʾiʿrāb, a kind of deus ex machina, a creed to which Arab grammarians devoted a quasi-unanimous worship and to which the ancient Arabists, with few exceptions, have joined without restraint. For the most part, classical Arabic was then to Latin what modern Arabic was to the neoLatin languages, that is to say an old inflected state contrary to a modern non-inflected one. The German in particular even though to see in Arabic what their language had itself experienced in terms of transition from an old state (Althochdeutsch) to a modern one (Neuhochdeutsch) through a middle state (Mittelhochdeutsch). To get rid of this prenotional knowledge, the article recalls the various criticisms, recent or old, made against the dogma of a relevant and truthful desinential inflection. It then insists on the distrust one can reach when reading the ancient Arab grammarians and their verbal or infraverbal statements. Finally, it","PeriodicalId":370667,"journal":{"name":"Case and Mood Endings in Semitic Languages – Myth or Reality? Désinences casuelles et modales dans les langues sémitiques – mythe ou réalité ?","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La flexion désinentielle et l’arabe État de la question et discussion d’arguments récents\",\"authors\":\"M. Sartori\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvcm4f7q.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to draw up the statement with respect to the inflectional endings with regard to Arabic. To do this, it first addresses the phenomenon of belief that can take on the ʾiʿrāb, a kind of deus ex machina, a creed to which Arab grammarians devoted a quasi-unanimous worship and to which the ancient Arabists, with few exceptions, have joined without restraint. For the most part, classical Arabic was then to Latin what modern Arabic was to the neoLatin languages, that is to say an old inflected state contrary to a modern non-inflected one. The German in particular even though to see in Arabic what their language had itself experienced in terms of transition from an old state (Althochdeutsch) to a modern one (Neuhochdeutsch) through a middle state (Mittelhochdeutsch). To get rid of this prenotional knowledge, the article recalls the various criticisms, recent or old, made against the dogma of a relevant and truthful desinential inflection. It then insists on the distrust one can reach when reading the ancient Arab grammarians and their verbal or infraverbal statements. Finally, it\",\"PeriodicalId\":370667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case and Mood Endings in Semitic Languages – Myth or Reality? Désinences casuelles et modales dans les langues sémitiques – mythe ou réalité ?\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case and Mood Endings in Semitic Languages – Myth or Reality? Désinences casuelles et modales dans les langues sémitiques – mythe ou réalité ?\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4f7q.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case and Mood Endings in Semitic Languages – Myth or Reality? Désinences casuelles et modales dans les langues sémitiques – mythe ou réalité ?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4f7q.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章的目的是起草关于阿拉伯语屈折词尾的声明。要做到这一点,它首先阐述了一种信仰现象,这种信仰可以接受《古兰经》rāb,这是一种神机妙法,一种阿拉伯语法学家近乎一致地崇拜的信条,而古代阿拉伯人,除了少数例外,都毫无节制地加入了它。在很大程度上,古典阿拉伯语之于拉丁语,就像现代阿拉伯语之于新拉丁语言,也就是说,一种古老的屈折状态与现代的无屈折状态相反。尤其是德国人,即使在阿拉伯语中看到他们的语言本身经历了从一个旧国家(Althochdeutsch)到一个现代国家(Neuhochdeutsch)再到一个中间国家(Mittelhochdeutsch)的转变。为了摆脱这种预知知识,文章回顾了各种各样的批评,最近或旧的,反对有关和真实的宿命变化的教条。然后,它坚持人们在阅读古代阿拉伯语法学家及其口头或非口头陈述时可以达到的不信任。最后,它
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La flexion désinentielle et l’arabe État de la question et discussion d’arguments récents
This article aims to draw up the statement with respect to the inflectional endings with regard to Arabic. To do this, it first addresses the phenomenon of belief that can take on the ʾiʿrāb, a kind of deus ex machina, a creed to which Arab grammarians devoted a quasi-unanimous worship and to which the ancient Arabists, with few exceptions, have joined without restraint. For the most part, classical Arabic was then to Latin what modern Arabic was to the neoLatin languages, that is to say an old inflected state contrary to a modern non-inflected one. The German in particular even though to see in Arabic what their language had itself experienced in terms of transition from an old state (Althochdeutsch) to a modern one (Neuhochdeutsch) through a middle state (Mittelhochdeutsch). To get rid of this prenotional knowledge, the article recalls the various criticisms, recent or old, made against the dogma of a relevant and truthful desinential inflection. It then insists on the distrust one can reach when reading the ancient Arab grammarians and their verbal or infraverbal statements. Finally, it
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信