在涉及多方的一般行政诉讼中放弃上诉权的效力详见最高行政法院2020年11月6日的判决,第2674/20号文件

Tomasz Kosicki
{"title":"在涉及多方的一般行政诉讼中放弃上诉权的效力详见最高行政法院2020年11月6日的判决,第2674/20号文件","authors":"Tomasz Kosicki","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.6965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The judgment under review addressed to the problem of the effectiveness of a declaration of waiver of the right of appeal in general administrative proceedings which involve more than one party. The Supreme Administrative Court justly concluded that the above statement can only be deemed effective when it is made by all parties. It is only then that the effect materialises of the decision becoming final and legally binding. In the judgment in question, it was noted that if one of the parties to the proceedings is omitted and subsequently appeals while invoking its legal interest, the statements previously made by the party actually participating in the administrative proceedings are not effective and have no legal effect. The gloss focuses exclusively on the designated procedural institution, hence it omits consideration of the substantive law provisions applied.","PeriodicalId":158454,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECTIVENESS OF WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO APPEAL IN GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS WITH MULTIPLE PARTIES GLOSS TO THE JUDGMENT OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF 6 NOVEMBER 2020, II OSK 2674/20\",\"authors\":\"Tomasz Kosicki\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0053.6965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The judgment under review addressed to the problem of the effectiveness of a declaration of waiver of the right of appeal in general administrative proceedings which involve more than one party. The Supreme Administrative Court justly concluded that the above statement can only be deemed effective when it is made by all parties. It is only then that the effect materialises of the decision becoming final and legally binding. In the judgment in question, it was noted that if one of the parties to the proceedings is omitted and subsequently appeals while invoking its legal interest, the statements previously made by the party actually participating in the administrative proceedings are not effective and have no legal effect. The gloss focuses exclusively on the designated procedural institution, hence it omits consideration of the substantive law provisions applied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.6965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.6965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正在审查的判决涉及在涉及一个以上当事方的一般行政诉讼中宣布放弃上诉权的效力问题。最高行政法院公正地得出结论,上述声明只有在各方都作出时才能被视为有效。只有到那时,决定才会产生最终的、具有法律约束力的效果。在有关的判决中,有人指出,如果诉讼的一方被省略,随后又在援引其法律利益的情况下提出上诉,则实际参与行政诉讼的一方以前所作的陈述是无效的,没有法律效力。这种解释只着重于指定的程序机构,因此忽略了对适用的实体法规定的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFFECTIVENESS OF WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO APPEAL IN GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS WITH MULTIPLE PARTIES GLOSS TO THE JUDGMENT OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF 6 NOVEMBER 2020, II OSK 2674/20
The judgment under review addressed to the problem of the effectiveness of a declaration of waiver of the right of appeal in general administrative proceedings which involve more than one party. The Supreme Administrative Court justly concluded that the above statement can only be deemed effective when it is made by all parties. It is only then that the effect materialises of the decision becoming final and legally binding. In the judgment in question, it was noted that if one of the parties to the proceedings is omitted and subsequently appeals while invoking its legal interest, the statements previously made by the party actually participating in the administrative proceedings are not effective and have no legal effect. The gloss focuses exclusively on the designated procedural institution, hence it omits consideration of the substantive law provisions applied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信