股骨颈骨折综合护理路径的审计

M. Hempling, A. Adhikari
{"title":"股骨颈骨折综合护理路径的审计","authors":"M. Hempling, A. Adhikari","doi":"10.1258/J.JICP.2005.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To assess quality of documentation in the fractured neck of femur pathway and to target problem areas with its use. Methods: Review of notes of all patients presenting to St Helier with a fractured neck of femur between 1 June and 31 August 2003. Results: Overall, doctors were worst at using the pathway; nurses were variable; physiotherapists were excellent. Several sections were underused or not used at all. A very low percentage managed to sign, date and include the patient's name. Conclusions: Better education, particularly of junior doctors, about how and why to use these documents and file them properly should eliminate the majority of problems with the use of the integrated care pathway.","PeriodicalId":114083,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Pathways","volume":"48 13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Audit of Fractured Neck of Femur Integrated Care Pathway\",\"authors\":\"M. Hempling, A. Adhikari\",\"doi\":\"10.1258/J.JICP.2005.112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To assess quality of documentation in the fractured neck of femur pathway and to target problem areas with its use. Methods: Review of notes of all patients presenting to St Helier with a fractured neck of femur between 1 June and 31 August 2003. Results: Overall, doctors were worst at using the pathway; nurses were variable; physiotherapists were excellent. Several sections were underused or not used at all. A very low percentage managed to sign, date and include the patient's name. Conclusions: Better education, particularly of junior doctors, about how and why to use these documents and file them properly should eliminate the majority of problems with the use of the integrated care pathway.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Care Pathways\",\"volume\":\"48 13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Care Pathways\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1258/J.JICP.2005.112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Pathways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1258/J.JICP.2005.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评估股骨颈骨折通路的文献质量,并针对其使用的问题区域。方法:回顾2003年6月1日至8月31日在圣赫利尔医院就诊的所有股骨颈骨折患者的记录。结果:总体而言,医生在使用该途径方面表现最差;护士是多变的;物理治疗师是优秀的。有几个部分没有得到充分利用或根本没有得到利用。只有很少一部分人能够在病历上签名、写上日期和病人的名字。结论:加强教育,特别是对初级医生进行教育,使他们了解如何以及为什么使用这些文件并正确归档,应该可以消除使用综合护理途径时出现的大多数问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Audit of Fractured Neck of Femur Integrated Care Pathway
Objectives: To assess quality of documentation in the fractured neck of femur pathway and to target problem areas with its use. Methods: Review of notes of all patients presenting to St Helier with a fractured neck of femur between 1 June and 31 August 2003. Results: Overall, doctors were worst at using the pathway; nurses were variable; physiotherapists were excellent. Several sections were underused or not used at all. A very low percentage managed to sign, date and include the patient's name. Conclusions: Better education, particularly of junior doctors, about how and why to use these documents and file them properly should eliminate the majority of problems with the use of the integrated care pathway.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信