{"title":"一种新型生物医学植入体结构的无损压缩算法分析","authors":"C. Strydis, G. Gaydadjiev","doi":"10.1145/1450135.1450160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In view of a booming market for microelectronic implants, our ongoing research work is focusing on the specification and design of a novel biomedical microprocessor core targeting a large subset of existing and future biomedical applications. Towards this end, we have taken steps in identifying various tasks commonly required by such applications and profiling their behavior and requirements. A prominent family of such tasks is lossless data compression. In this work we profile a large collection of compression algorithms on suitably selected biomedical workloads. Compression ratio, average and peak power consumption, total energy budget, compression rate and program-code size metrics have been evaluated. Findings indicate the best-performing algorithms across most metrics to be mlzo (scores high in 5 out of 6 imposed metrics) and fin (present in 4 out of 6 metrics). Further mlzo profiling reveals the dominance of i) address-generation, load, branch and compare instructions, and ii) interdependent logical-logical and logical-compare instructions combinations.","PeriodicalId":300268,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis","volume":"168 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiling of lossless-compression algorithms for a novel biomedical-implant architecture\",\"authors\":\"C. Strydis, G. Gaydadjiev\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1450135.1450160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In view of a booming market for microelectronic implants, our ongoing research work is focusing on the specification and design of a novel biomedical microprocessor core targeting a large subset of existing and future biomedical applications. Towards this end, we have taken steps in identifying various tasks commonly required by such applications and profiling their behavior and requirements. A prominent family of such tasks is lossless data compression. In this work we profile a large collection of compression algorithms on suitably selected biomedical workloads. Compression ratio, average and peak power consumption, total energy budget, compression rate and program-code size metrics have been evaluated. Findings indicate the best-performing algorithms across most metrics to be mlzo (scores high in 5 out of 6 imposed metrics) and fin (present in 4 out of 6 metrics). Further mlzo profiling reveals the dominance of i) address-generation, load, branch and compare instructions, and ii) interdependent logical-logical and logical-compare instructions combinations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis\",\"volume\":\"168 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1450135.1450160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1450135.1450160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Profiling of lossless-compression algorithms for a novel biomedical-implant architecture
In view of a booming market for microelectronic implants, our ongoing research work is focusing on the specification and design of a novel biomedical microprocessor core targeting a large subset of existing and future biomedical applications. Towards this end, we have taken steps in identifying various tasks commonly required by such applications and profiling their behavior and requirements. A prominent family of such tasks is lossless data compression. In this work we profile a large collection of compression algorithms on suitably selected biomedical workloads. Compression ratio, average and peak power consumption, total energy budget, compression rate and program-code size metrics have been evaluated. Findings indicate the best-performing algorithms across most metrics to be mlzo (scores high in 5 out of 6 imposed metrics) and fin (present in 4 out of 6 metrics). Further mlzo profiling reveals the dominance of i) address-generation, load, branch and compare instructions, and ii) interdependent logical-logical and logical-compare instructions combinations.