{"title":"双侧rTMS治疗难治性抑郁症的随机对照试验","authors":"P. Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1017/S1748232107000018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background : Antidepressant effects have been demonstrated with both high-frequency left-sided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) (HFL-TMS) and low-frequency stimulation to the right prefrontal cortex (LFR-TMS). However, doubts remain about the extent of these reported treatment effects. Design and Methods : The study was a 6 week double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial of sequential bilateral rTMS (SBrTMS) in depression. The method consisted of 3 trains of LFR-TMS of 140 s duration at 1 Hz being applied daily followed immediately by 15 trains of 5 s duration of HFL-TMS at 10 Hz. Sham stimulation was applied using identical parameters, but with the coil angled at 45 degrees from the scalp resting on the side of one wing of the coil. Results : There was a significant difference in response between the two groups at the 2-week time-point ( F (1,25) = 25.5, p F (5,44) = 3.9, p = 0.005). A significant proportion of the active study group met response (11/25) and remission criteria (9/25) by study end compared to the sham group (2 and 0/22). Interpretation : Bilateral rTMS treatment, involving the sequential application of both HFL-TMS and LFR-TMS, has substantial treatment efficacy in patients with treatment-resistant depression. The treatment response is clinically significant following 4–6 weeks of active treatment. Therefore this novel style of bilateral rTMS has the potential to become a substantive clinical intervention, although the study requires replication.","PeriodicalId":347111,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neurotherapeutics and Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized-controlled trial of bilateral rTMS for treatment-resistant depression\",\"authors\":\"P. Fitzgerald\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1748232107000018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background : Antidepressant effects have been demonstrated with both high-frequency left-sided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) (HFL-TMS) and low-frequency stimulation to the right prefrontal cortex (LFR-TMS). However, doubts remain about the extent of these reported treatment effects. Design and Methods : The study was a 6 week double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial of sequential bilateral rTMS (SBrTMS) in depression. The method consisted of 3 trains of LFR-TMS of 140 s duration at 1 Hz being applied daily followed immediately by 15 trains of 5 s duration of HFL-TMS at 10 Hz. Sham stimulation was applied using identical parameters, but with the coil angled at 45 degrees from the scalp resting on the side of one wing of the coil. Results : There was a significant difference in response between the two groups at the 2-week time-point ( F (1,25) = 25.5, p F (5,44) = 3.9, p = 0.005). A significant proportion of the active study group met response (11/25) and remission criteria (9/25) by study end compared to the sham group (2 and 0/22). Interpretation : Bilateral rTMS treatment, involving the sequential application of both HFL-TMS and LFR-TMS, has substantial treatment efficacy in patients with treatment-resistant depression. The treatment response is clinically significant following 4–6 weeks of active treatment. Therefore this novel style of bilateral rTMS has the potential to become a substantive clinical intervention, although the study requires replication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Neurotherapeutics and Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Neurotherapeutics and Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1748232107000018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neurotherapeutics and Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1748232107000018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:高频左侧重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS) (HFL-TMS)和低频右前额叶皮质刺激(LFR-TMS)均有抗抑郁作用。然而,对这些报道的治疗效果的程度仍然存在疑问。设计与方法:本研究是一项为期6周的双盲随机假对照试验,采用顺序双侧rTMS (SBrTMS)治疗抑郁症。该方法包括每天使用3列持续时间为140秒、频率为1hz的低通量-经颅磁刺激,紧接着使用15列持续时间为5秒、频率为10hz的高通量-经颅磁刺激。假性刺激使用相同的参数,但线圈与头皮成45度角,放置在线圈的一侧。结果:两组在2周时间点的疗效差异有统计学意义(F (1,25) = 25.5, p F (5,44) = 3.9, p = 0.005)。与假手术组(2和0/22)相比,活跃研究组在研究结束时达到缓解标准(11/25)和缓解标准(9/25)的比例显著。解释:双侧rTMS治疗,包括HFL-TMS和LFR-TMS的顺序应用,对难治性抑郁症患者具有显著的治疗效果。在4-6周的积极治疗后,治疗反应具有临床意义。因此,这种新型的双侧rTMS有可能成为一种实质性的临床干预措施,尽管该研究需要复制。
A randomized-controlled trial of bilateral rTMS for treatment-resistant depression
ABSTRACT Background : Antidepressant effects have been demonstrated with both high-frequency left-sided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) (HFL-TMS) and low-frequency stimulation to the right prefrontal cortex (LFR-TMS). However, doubts remain about the extent of these reported treatment effects. Design and Methods : The study was a 6 week double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial of sequential bilateral rTMS (SBrTMS) in depression. The method consisted of 3 trains of LFR-TMS of 140 s duration at 1 Hz being applied daily followed immediately by 15 trains of 5 s duration of HFL-TMS at 10 Hz. Sham stimulation was applied using identical parameters, but with the coil angled at 45 degrees from the scalp resting on the side of one wing of the coil. Results : There was a significant difference in response between the two groups at the 2-week time-point ( F (1,25) = 25.5, p F (5,44) = 3.9, p = 0.005). A significant proportion of the active study group met response (11/25) and remission criteria (9/25) by study end compared to the sham group (2 and 0/22). Interpretation : Bilateral rTMS treatment, involving the sequential application of both HFL-TMS and LFR-TMS, has substantial treatment efficacy in patients with treatment-resistant depression. The treatment response is clinically significant following 4–6 weeks of active treatment. Therefore this novel style of bilateral rTMS has the potential to become a substantive clinical intervention, although the study requires replication.