基于核的聚类有效性指标的开发与评价

Rui Fa, A. Nandi, Basel Abu-Jamous
{"title":"基于核的聚类有效性指标的开发与评价","authors":"Rui Fa, A. Nandi, Basel Abu-Jamous","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.42846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, there are two objectives: on one hand, we extend four conventional validity indices, namely the DI, the II, the CH, and the GI, to four kernel-based validity indices, correspondingly, the kDI, the kII, the kCH and the kGI; on the other hand, we conduct a Monte-Carlo simulation to evaluate and compare these validity indices. The numerical results show that some kernel validity indices work significant better than conventional ones and some of the validity indices work poorly or do not work at all in our study.","PeriodicalId":201182,"journal":{"name":"2012 Proceedings of the 20th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and evaluation of kernel-based clustering validity indices\",\"authors\":\"Rui Fa, A. Nandi, Basel Abu-Jamous\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.42846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, there are two objectives: on one hand, we extend four conventional validity indices, namely the DI, the II, the CH, and the GI, to four kernel-based validity indices, correspondingly, the kDI, the kII, the kCH and the kGI; on the other hand, we conduct a Monte-Carlo simulation to evaluate and compare these validity indices. The numerical results show that some kernel validity indices work significant better than conventional ones and some of the validity indices work poorly or do not work at all in our study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Proceedings of the 20th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Proceedings of the 20th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.42846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Proceedings of the 20th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.42846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的研究目标有两个:一方面,将传统的4个效度指标即DI、II、CH和GI扩展为4个基于核函数的效度指标,分别为kDI、kII、kCH和kGI;另一方面,我们通过蒙特卡罗模拟来评价和比较这些有效性指标。数值结果表明,在本文的研究中,一些核效度指标明显优于传统的核效度指标,而一些核效度指标表现不佳或根本不工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and evaluation of kernel-based clustering validity indices
In this paper, there are two objectives: on one hand, we extend four conventional validity indices, namely the DI, the II, the CH, and the GI, to four kernel-based validity indices, correspondingly, the kDI, the kII, the kCH and the kGI; on the other hand, we conduct a Monte-Carlo simulation to evaluate and compare these validity indices. The numerical results show that some kernel validity indices work significant better than conventional ones and some of the validity indices work poorly or do not work at all in our study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信