《纲领与暴动:1881年至1882年,德国保守派和犹太媒体以及德国和俄国的集体反犹暴力》

S. Weinberg
{"title":"《纲领与暴动:1881年至1882年,德国保守派和犹太媒体以及德国和俄国的集体反犹暴力》","authors":"S. Weinberg","doi":"10.1093/LEOBAECK/52.1.325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Events of collective anti-Jewish violence in the German Empire in the second half of the nineteenth century have received substantial scholarly attention in recent years. These investigations focus primarily on the events themselves, providing a historical analysis at a local level of their causes, course, and processes. Yet, historians have tended to eschew examinations of the responses of the wider press to such events. Based on four newspapers, affiliated with the Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish milieu, the thesis offers a wide-ranging insight into responses to anti-Jewish violence occurring in Germany and Russia in 1881-1882. It evaluates how collective violence in the so-called \"civilized\" countries of Europe was assessed and may have been legitimized. In the German Empire it was not possible to openly call for violence, considering the strict notions of law and order. Yet, it was possible to display empathy with the perpetrators. Modern anti-Semitism had developed a particular rhetoric when attacking the Jews, which has been termed \"civilization of Jew-hatred.\"1 It meant a contradictory line of argument, which distanced and identified with anti-Semitism, condemned and justified anti-Semitism. This study evaluates whether this strategy was also applied to anti-Jewish violence and if so, how this was done. The thesis discusses too the effect of political events and developments, such as elections and the Kidturkampf, on responses to anti-Jewish violence. It demonstrates how arguments changed in the dynamics of daily politics and highlights the complexity of responses towards anti-Jewish violence, which were to a significant degree contingent on political developments. The research thus provides a contribution to our understanding of the formation and changes of arguments held towards collective violence. The study challenges traditional views on anti-Jewish violence in the late nineteenth century.","PeriodicalId":391272,"journal":{"name":"The Leo Baeck Institute Year Book","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progroms and Riots: The German Conservative and the Jewish Press and Collective Anti-Jewish Violence in Germany and Russia, 1881–1882\",\"authors\":\"S. Weinberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/LEOBAECK/52.1.325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Events of collective anti-Jewish violence in the German Empire in the second half of the nineteenth century have received substantial scholarly attention in recent years. These investigations focus primarily on the events themselves, providing a historical analysis at a local level of their causes, course, and processes. Yet, historians have tended to eschew examinations of the responses of the wider press to such events. Based on four newspapers, affiliated with the Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish milieu, the thesis offers a wide-ranging insight into responses to anti-Jewish violence occurring in Germany and Russia in 1881-1882. It evaluates how collective violence in the so-called \\\"civilized\\\" countries of Europe was assessed and may have been legitimized. In the German Empire it was not possible to openly call for violence, considering the strict notions of law and order. Yet, it was possible to display empathy with the perpetrators. Modern anti-Semitism had developed a particular rhetoric when attacking the Jews, which has been termed \\\"civilization of Jew-hatred.\\\"1 It meant a contradictory line of argument, which distanced and identified with anti-Semitism, condemned and justified anti-Semitism. This study evaluates whether this strategy was also applied to anti-Jewish violence and if so, how this was done. The thesis discusses too the effect of political events and developments, such as elections and the Kidturkampf, on responses to anti-Jewish violence. It demonstrates how arguments changed in the dynamics of daily politics and highlights the complexity of responses towards anti-Jewish violence, which were to a significant degree contingent on political developments. The research thus provides a contribution to our understanding of the formation and changes of arguments held towards collective violence. The study challenges traditional views on anti-Jewish violence in the late nineteenth century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Leo Baeck Institute Year Book\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Leo Baeck Institute Year Book\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/LEOBAECK/52.1.325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Leo Baeck Institute Year Book","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/LEOBAECK/52.1.325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

19世纪下半叶德意志帝国的集体反犹太人暴力事件近年来受到了大量的学术关注。这些调查主要关注事件本身,在当地层面上对事件的起因、过程和过程进行历史分析。然而,历史学家们倾向于回避研究更广泛的媒体对这些事件的反应。该论文以四份报纸为基础,分别隶属于新教、天主教和犹太环境,对1881年至1882年发生在德国和俄罗斯的反犹太暴力事件的反应提供了广泛的见解。它评估了欧洲所谓“文明”国家的集体暴力是如何被评估并可能被合法化的。在德意志帝国,考虑到严格的法律和秩序,公开呼吁暴力是不可能的。然而,对肇事者表示同情是可能的。现代反犹太主义在攻击犹太人时形成了一种特殊的修辞,被称为“仇恨犹太人的文明”。它意味着一种相互矛盾的论证路线,它与反犹太主义保持距离并认同,谴责反犹太主义并为其辩护。这项研究评估了这种策略是否也适用于反犹太人的暴力,如果适用,是如何做到的。本文还讨论了政治事件和发展的影响,如选举和Kidturkampf,对反犹太暴力的反应。它展示了日常政治动态中的争论是如何变化的,并强调了对反犹太暴力的反应的复杂性,这在很大程度上取决于政治发展。因此,这项研究有助于我们理解关于集体暴力的争论的形成和变化。这项研究对19世纪后期反犹太人暴力的传统观点提出了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Progroms and Riots: The German Conservative and the Jewish Press and Collective Anti-Jewish Violence in Germany and Russia, 1881–1882
Events of collective anti-Jewish violence in the German Empire in the second half of the nineteenth century have received substantial scholarly attention in recent years. These investigations focus primarily on the events themselves, providing a historical analysis at a local level of their causes, course, and processes. Yet, historians have tended to eschew examinations of the responses of the wider press to such events. Based on four newspapers, affiliated with the Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish milieu, the thesis offers a wide-ranging insight into responses to anti-Jewish violence occurring in Germany and Russia in 1881-1882. It evaluates how collective violence in the so-called "civilized" countries of Europe was assessed and may have been legitimized. In the German Empire it was not possible to openly call for violence, considering the strict notions of law and order. Yet, it was possible to display empathy with the perpetrators. Modern anti-Semitism had developed a particular rhetoric when attacking the Jews, which has been termed "civilization of Jew-hatred."1 It meant a contradictory line of argument, which distanced and identified with anti-Semitism, condemned and justified anti-Semitism. This study evaluates whether this strategy was also applied to anti-Jewish violence and if so, how this was done. The thesis discusses too the effect of political events and developments, such as elections and the Kidturkampf, on responses to anti-Jewish violence. It demonstrates how arguments changed in the dynamics of daily politics and highlights the complexity of responses towards anti-Jewish violence, which were to a significant degree contingent on political developments. The research thus provides a contribution to our understanding of the formation and changes of arguments held towards collective violence. The study challenges traditional views on anti-Jewish violence in the late nineteenth century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信