跨多个时间尺度验证计算认知过程模型

Christopher W. Myers, K. Gluck, G. Gunzelmann, M. Krusmark
{"title":"跨多个时间尺度验证计算认知过程模型","authors":"Christopher W. Myers, K. Gluck, G. Gunzelmann, M. Krusmark","doi":"10.2478/v10229-011-0012-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Validating Computational Cognitive Process Models across Multiple Timescales Model comparison is vital to evaluating progress in the fields of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and cognitive architecture. As they mature, AGI and cognitive architectures will become increasingly capable of providing a single model that completes a multitude of tasks, some of which the model was not specifically engineered to perform. These models will be expected to operate for extended periods of time and serve functional roles in real-world contexts. Questions arise regarding how to evaluate such models appropriately, including issues pertaining to model comparison and validation. In this paper, we specifically address model validation across multiple levels of abstraction, using an existing computational process model of unmanned aerial vehicle basic maneuvering to illustrate the relationship between validity and timescales of analysis.","PeriodicalId":247142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial General Intelligence","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating Computational Cognitive Process Models across Multiple Timescales\",\"authors\":\"Christopher W. Myers, K. Gluck, G. Gunzelmann, M. Krusmark\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/v10229-011-0012-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Validating Computational Cognitive Process Models across Multiple Timescales Model comparison is vital to evaluating progress in the fields of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and cognitive architecture. As they mature, AGI and cognitive architectures will become increasingly capable of providing a single model that completes a multitude of tasks, some of which the model was not specifically engineered to perform. These models will be expected to operate for extended periods of time and serve functional roles in real-world contexts. Questions arise regarding how to evaluate such models appropriately, including issues pertaining to model comparison and validation. In this paper, we specifically address model validation across multiple levels of abstraction, using an existing computational process model of unmanned aerial vehicle basic maneuvering to illustrate the relationship between validity and timescales of analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":247142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Artificial General Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Artificial General Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/v10229-011-0012-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial General Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/v10229-011-0012-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

模型比较对于评估人工智能(AGI)和认知架构领域的进展至关重要。随着它们的成熟,AGI和认知架构将越来越有能力提供一个单一的模型来完成大量的任务,其中一些模型并不是专门设计来执行的。这些模型将被期望在较长时间内运行,并在现实环境中发挥功能性作用。关于如何适当地评估这些模型的问题出现了,包括与模型比较和验证有关的问题。在本文中,我们特别讨论了跨多个抽象层次的模型验证,使用现有的无人机基本机动计算过程模型来说明分析的有效性与时间尺度之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating Computational Cognitive Process Models across Multiple Timescales
Validating Computational Cognitive Process Models across Multiple Timescales Model comparison is vital to evaluating progress in the fields of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and cognitive architecture. As they mature, AGI and cognitive architectures will become increasingly capable of providing a single model that completes a multitude of tasks, some of which the model was not specifically engineered to perform. These models will be expected to operate for extended periods of time and serve functional roles in real-world contexts. Questions arise regarding how to evaluate such models appropriately, including issues pertaining to model comparison and validation. In this paper, we specifically address model validation across multiple levels of abstraction, using an existing computational process model of unmanned aerial vehicle basic maneuvering to illustrate the relationship between validity and timescales of analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信