以滥用支配地位罪强制执行电信sep

Miko Mustonen
{"title":"以滥用支配地位罪强制执行电信sep","authors":"Miko Mustonen","doi":"10.33344/vol11ypp48-73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Telecommunications industry uses extensive standardisation to ensure interoperability between the devices of competing manufacturers. SEPs, or patents incorporated in related technical standards, are of extraordinary importance in the industry. Hence seeking legal remedies for SEP infringements may compromise effective competition in the internal market and may thus fall within the scope of Article 102 TFEU on abuse of dominant position. In this paper I review, on which conditions the SEP holder is allowed to seek legal remedies for SEP infringement without being restrained by Article 102 TFEU. I conclude that a dominant position is established nearly always through mere SEP ownership, and this dominant position is abused by bringing an SEP infringement suit if the sought remedy has a direct effect on the market access of the SEP implementer and the SEP holder does not have an objective justification to seek such remedies.","PeriodicalId":215987,"journal":{"name":"Helsinki Law Review","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enforcing Telecoms SEPs as Abuse of Dominant Position\",\"authors\":\"Miko Mustonen\",\"doi\":\"10.33344/vol11ypp48-73\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Telecommunications industry uses extensive standardisation to ensure interoperability between the devices of competing manufacturers. SEPs, or patents incorporated in related technical standards, are of extraordinary importance in the industry. Hence seeking legal remedies for SEP infringements may compromise effective competition in the internal market and may thus fall within the scope of Article 102 TFEU on abuse of dominant position. In this paper I review, on which conditions the SEP holder is allowed to seek legal remedies for SEP infringement without being restrained by Article 102 TFEU. I conclude that a dominant position is established nearly always through mere SEP ownership, and this dominant position is abused by bringing an SEP infringement suit if the sought remedy has a direct effect on the market access of the SEP implementer and the SEP holder does not have an objective justification to seek such remedies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":215987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Helsinki Law Review\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Helsinki Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33344/vol11ypp48-73\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Helsinki Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33344/vol11ypp48-73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电信行业使用广泛的标准化来确保相互竞争的制造商的设备之间的互操作性。sep,或相关技术标准中包含的专利,在行业中非常重要。因此,对SEP侵权行为寻求法律救济可能会损害内部市场的有效竞争,因此可能属于TFEU第102条关于滥用支配地位的范围。在何种情况下,SEP权利人可以不受《商标法》第102条的限制而对SEP侵权进行法律救济。我的结论是,主导地位几乎总是通过单纯的SEP所有权建立的,如果所寻求的救济对SEP实施者的市场准入有直接影响,并且SEP持有人没有寻求此类救济的客观理由,则通过提起SEP侵权诉讼来滥用这种主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enforcing Telecoms SEPs as Abuse of Dominant Position
Telecommunications industry uses extensive standardisation to ensure interoperability between the devices of competing manufacturers. SEPs, or patents incorporated in related technical standards, are of extraordinary importance in the industry. Hence seeking legal remedies for SEP infringements may compromise effective competition in the internal market and may thus fall within the scope of Article 102 TFEU on abuse of dominant position. In this paper I review, on which conditions the SEP holder is allowed to seek legal remedies for SEP infringement without being restrained by Article 102 TFEU. I conclude that a dominant position is established nearly always through mere SEP ownership, and this dominant position is abused by bringing an SEP infringement suit if the sought remedy has a direct effect on the market access of the SEP implementer and the SEP holder does not have an objective justification to seek such remedies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信