对准点距离分布对光学透明头戴式显示器SPAAM标定的影响

Kenneth R. Moser, M. S. Arefin, J. Swan
{"title":"对准点距离分布对光学透明头戴式显示器SPAAM标定的影响","authors":"Kenneth R. Moser, M. S. Arefin, J. Swan","doi":"10.1109/VR.2018.8446429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays (OST-HMDs) for presenting Augmented Reality experiences has become more common, due to the increasing availability of lower cost head-worn device options. Despite this growth, commercially available OST hardware remains devoid of the integrated eye-tracking cameras necessary for automatically calibrating user-specific view parameters, leaving manual calibration methods as the most consistently viable option across display types. The Single Point Active Alignment Method (SPAAM) is currently the most-cited manual calibration technique, due to the relaxation of user constraints with respect to allowable motion during the calibration process. This work presents the first formal study directly investigating the effects that alignment point distribution imposes on SPAAM calibration accuracy and precision. A user experiment, employing a single expert user, is presented, in which SPAAM calibrations are performed under each of five conditions. Four of the conditions cross alignment distance (arm length, room scale) with user pose (sitting, standing). The fifth condition is a control condition, in which the user is replaced with a rigidly mounted camera; the control condition removes the effect of noise from uncontrollable postural sway. The final experimental results show no significant impact on calibration due to user pose (sitting, standing). The control condition also did not differ from the user produced calibration results, suggesting that posture sway was not a significant factor. However, both the user and control conditions show significant improvement using arm's length alignment points over room scale alignments, with an order of magnitude difference in eye location estimate error between conditions.","PeriodicalId":355048,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Alignment Point Distance Distribution on SPAAM Calibration of Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth R. Moser, M. S. Arefin, J. Swan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VR.2018.8446429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays (OST-HMDs) for presenting Augmented Reality experiences has become more common, due to the increasing availability of lower cost head-worn device options. Despite this growth, commercially available OST hardware remains devoid of the integrated eye-tracking cameras necessary for automatically calibrating user-specific view parameters, leaving manual calibration methods as the most consistently viable option across display types. The Single Point Active Alignment Method (SPAAM) is currently the most-cited manual calibration technique, due to the relaxation of user constraints with respect to allowable motion during the calibration process. This work presents the first formal study directly investigating the effects that alignment point distribution imposes on SPAAM calibration accuracy and precision. A user experiment, employing a single expert user, is presented, in which SPAAM calibrations are performed under each of five conditions. Four of the conditions cross alignment distance (arm length, room scale) with user pose (sitting, standing). The fifth condition is a control condition, in which the user is replaced with a rigidly mounted camera; the control condition removes the effect of noise from uncontrollable postural sway. The final experimental results show no significant impact on calibration due to user pose (sitting, standing). The control condition also did not differ from the user produced calibration results, suggesting that posture sway was not a significant factor. However, both the user and control conditions show significant improvement using arm's length alignment points over room scale alignments, with an order of magnitude difference in eye location estimate error between conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2018.8446429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2018.8446429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

由于低成本的头戴式设备选项越来越多,使用光学透明头戴式显示器(ost - hmd)来呈现增强现实体验已经变得越来越普遍。尽管这种增长,商用OST硬件仍然缺乏自动校准用户特定视图参数所需的集成眼动追踪摄像头,使得手动校准方法成为跨显示类型最一致的可行选择。单点主动对准法(SPAAM)是目前引用最多的手动校准技术,因为在校准过程中,用户对允许运动的限制放宽了。本文首次正式研究了准直点分布对SPAAM标定精度和精度的影响。一个用户实验,采用单一的专家用户,提出了在五个条件下进行SPAAM校准。四种条件下的交叉对齐距离(臂长、房间尺度)与使用者姿势(坐、站)。第五种条件为控制条件,将用户替换为固定安装的摄像机;控制条件消除了不可控的体位摆动所带来的噪声影响。最终的实验结果表明,用户姿势(坐、站)对校准没有显著影响。控制条件也与用户产生的校准结果没有差异,这表明姿势摇摆不是一个重要因素。然而,使用手臂长度对准点的用户条件和控制条件都比房间尺度对准有显著改善,两种条件下眼睛定位估计误差相差一个数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Alignment Point Distance Distribution on SPAAM Calibration of Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays
The use of Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays (OST-HMDs) for presenting Augmented Reality experiences has become more common, due to the increasing availability of lower cost head-worn device options. Despite this growth, commercially available OST hardware remains devoid of the integrated eye-tracking cameras necessary for automatically calibrating user-specific view parameters, leaving manual calibration methods as the most consistently viable option across display types. The Single Point Active Alignment Method (SPAAM) is currently the most-cited manual calibration technique, due to the relaxation of user constraints with respect to allowable motion during the calibration process. This work presents the first formal study directly investigating the effects that alignment point distribution imposes on SPAAM calibration accuracy and precision. A user experiment, employing a single expert user, is presented, in which SPAAM calibrations are performed under each of five conditions. Four of the conditions cross alignment distance (arm length, room scale) with user pose (sitting, standing). The fifth condition is a control condition, in which the user is replaced with a rigidly mounted camera; the control condition removes the effect of noise from uncontrollable postural sway. The final experimental results show no significant impact on calibration due to user pose (sitting, standing). The control condition also did not differ from the user produced calibration results, suggesting that posture sway was not a significant factor. However, both the user and control conditions show significant improvement using arm's length alignment points over room scale alignments, with an order of magnitude difference in eye location estimate error between conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信