Irina R. Garri
{"title":"Буддизм и политика во Внутренней Азии","authors":"Irina R. Garri","doi":"10.22162/2619-0990-2020-47-1-8-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article focuses on the history of Tibetan Buddhism in Inner Asia. Goal. It analyzes the main peculiarities of the Tibetan Buddhist tradition and the turning points of its history in the context of contradictions between Inner Asian polities, the Russian and Qing empires. Materials and Methods. The paper is based on the fundamental historical works dealing with Inner Asia. The methodology applied is determined by the understanding of Tibetan-Mongolian Buddhism as a cultural unity within which regional traditions share similar institutional forms. Results and Conclusions. The paper notes a peculiar feature of the Tibetan Buddhist tradition is the personality cult of the Teacher worshipped as an ‘incarnate’ Buddha ― tulku (Tib. sprul-sku); model of relationship between the latter and secular powers expressed by the concept of choyon (Tib. mcho-yon ‘lama-patron’); theocratic form of government manifested by the formula ‘unity of religion and politics’ (Tib. chos-sridzung-‘brel). A crucial milestone in the history of Inner Asia was the emergence of the Qing and Russian empires. The destruction of the Dzungar Khanate and delimitation of borders between China and Russia led that Inner Asia no longer existed as a cluster of struggling polities, and the subsequent historical era completely transformed the place and role of the Mongols and Tibetans in the region. The main stream policy of both the states towards Buddhism and its communities was decentralization and fragmentation, on the one hand, and patronage, on the other. This, along with efforts of Buddhists proper, resulted  in that by the early 20th century Inner Asia was housing immense spaces of Tibetan Buddhism with religious centers in Lhasa, Beijing, and Urga. Despite the Buddhist tradition was not united structurally, it was still distinguished by cultural homogeneity based on the spiritual authority of the Gelug sect and the latter’s hierarchs — Dalai Lamas, Panchen Lamas and Jebtsundamba Khutukhtus, similar monastic educational systems, institution of incarnate lamas, classical Tibetan language and Buddhist Canon, Vajrayana cult system.","PeriodicalId":434355,"journal":{"name":"The Oriental studies","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oriental studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2020-47-1-8-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。本文主要研究藏传佛教在中亚地区的历史。的目标。它分析了藏传佛教传统的主要特点及其在亚洲内部政治,俄罗斯和清朝帝国之间矛盾的背景下的历史转折点。材料与方法。本文以有关内亚的基本历史著作为基础。所采用的方法取决于对藏蒙佛教作为一个文化统一体的理解,在这个统一体中,区域传统具有相似的制度形式。结果与结论。论文指出,藏传佛教传统的一个特点是对导师的个人崇拜,被崇拜为“化身”的佛陀-祖古(藏文)。sprul-sku);后者与世俗权力之间的关系模式,由choyon (xz)的概念所表达。mcho-yon lama-patron);政府的神权形式表现为“宗教和政治的统一”。chos-sridzung——“brel)。内亚历史上一个至关重要的里程碑是清朝和俄罗斯帝国的出现。准噶尔汗国的覆灭和中俄边界的划定使得内亚不再是一群相互争斗的政体,而随后的历史时代也彻底改变了蒙古人和西藏人在该地区的地位和角色。这两个国家对佛教及其社区的主流政策,一方面是分散和分裂,另一方面是赞助。在佛教徒的努力下,到20世纪初,内亚地区形成了巨大的藏传佛教空间,包括拉萨、北京和乌尔嘎等宗教中心。尽管佛教传统在结构上并不统一,但其文化同质性仍然突出,其基础是格鲁派和格鲁派的精神权威——达赖喇嘛、班禅喇嘛和杰布尊丹巴库图库图斯,类似的寺院教育制度,转世喇嘛制度,经典藏语和佛教经典,金刚乘崇拜制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Буддизм и политика во Внутренней Азии
Introduction. The article focuses on the history of Tibetan Buddhism in Inner Asia. Goal. It analyzes the main peculiarities of the Tibetan Buddhist tradition and the turning points of its history in the context of contradictions between Inner Asian polities, the Russian and Qing empires. Materials and Methods. The paper is based on the fundamental historical works dealing with Inner Asia. The methodology applied is determined by the understanding of Tibetan-Mongolian Buddhism as a cultural unity within which regional traditions share similar institutional forms. Results and Conclusions. The paper notes a peculiar feature of the Tibetan Buddhist tradition is the personality cult of the Teacher worshipped as an ‘incarnate’ Buddha ― tulku (Tib. sprul-sku); model of relationship between the latter and secular powers expressed by the concept of choyon (Tib. mcho-yon ‘lama-patron’); theocratic form of government manifested by the formula ‘unity of religion and politics’ (Tib. chos-sridzung-‘brel). A crucial milestone in the history of Inner Asia was the emergence of the Qing and Russian empires. The destruction of the Dzungar Khanate and delimitation of borders between China and Russia led that Inner Asia no longer existed as a cluster of struggling polities, and the subsequent historical era completely transformed the place and role of the Mongols and Tibetans in the region. The main stream policy of both the states towards Buddhism and its communities was decentralization and fragmentation, on the one hand, and patronage, on the other. This, along with efforts of Buddhists proper, resulted  in that by the early 20th century Inner Asia was housing immense spaces of Tibetan Buddhism with religious centers in Lhasa, Beijing, and Urga. Despite the Buddhist tradition was not united structurally, it was still distinguished by cultural homogeneity based on the spiritual authority of the Gelug sect and the latter’s hierarchs — Dalai Lamas, Panchen Lamas and Jebtsundamba Khutukhtus, similar monastic educational systems, institution of incarnate lamas, classical Tibetan language and Buddhist Canon, Vajrayana cult system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信