保护投资条约免受冲突相关伤害

Jure Zrilič
{"title":"保护投资条约免受冲突相关伤害","authors":"Jure Zrilič","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198830375.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyses the investment treaty provisions most likely to be invoked by investors to redress conflict-related losses, notably the full protection and security provision (FPS) and the armed conflict clause. First, it examines the scope of the FPS standard, focusing on ‘police powers’ and ‘due diligence’ as two concepts that help demarcate the obligation under the provision. Second, it considers different types of armed conflict clauses and addresses the jurisprudential inconsistencies, in particular with regard to their relationship with FPS. Finally, the chapter looks into other treaty provisions (expropriation and fair and equitable treatment), arguing that investors’ expectations as to their protections will be likely assessed in light of the conflict crisis.","PeriodicalId":216149,"journal":{"name":"The Protection of Foreign Investment in Times of Armed Conflict","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investment Treaty Protections against Conflict-Related Injuries\",\"authors\":\"Jure Zrilič\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198830375.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter analyses the investment treaty provisions most likely to be invoked by investors to redress conflict-related losses, notably the full protection and security provision (FPS) and the armed conflict clause. First, it examines the scope of the FPS standard, focusing on ‘police powers’ and ‘due diligence’ as two concepts that help demarcate the obligation under the provision. Second, it considers different types of armed conflict clauses and addresses the jurisprudential inconsistencies, in particular with regard to their relationship with FPS. Finally, the chapter looks into other treaty provisions (expropriation and fair and equitable treatment), arguing that investors’ expectations as to their protections will be likely assessed in light of the conflict crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":216149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Protection of Foreign Investment in Times of Armed Conflict\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Protection of Foreign Investment in Times of Armed Conflict\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198830375.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Protection of Foreign Investment in Times of Armed Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198830375.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章分析了投资者最有可能援引的投资条约条款,以弥补与冲突有关的损失,特别是充分保护和安全条款(FPS)和武装冲突条款。首先,它审查了FPS标准的范围,重点关注“警察权力”和“尽职调查”这两个概念,这两个概念有助于界定该条款下的义务。其次,它考虑了不同类型的武装冲突条款,并处理了法理上的不一致,特别是它们与武装冲突条款的关系。最后,本章探讨了其他条约条款(征用和公平与公平待遇),认为投资者对其保护的期望可能会根据冲突危机进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investment Treaty Protections against Conflict-Related Injuries
This chapter analyses the investment treaty provisions most likely to be invoked by investors to redress conflict-related losses, notably the full protection and security provision (FPS) and the armed conflict clause. First, it examines the scope of the FPS standard, focusing on ‘police powers’ and ‘due diligence’ as two concepts that help demarcate the obligation under the provision. Second, it considers different types of armed conflict clauses and addresses the jurisprudential inconsistencies, in particular with regard to their relationship with FPS. Finally, the chapter looks into other treaty provisions (expropriation and fair and equitable treatment), arguing that investors’ expectations as to their protections will be likely assessed in light of the conflict crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信