草书词识别的分割与非分割的神经技术:实验分析

Xialong Fan, B. Verma
{"title":"草书词识别的分割与非分割的神经技术:实验分析","authors":"Xialong Fan, B. Verma","doi":"10.1109/ICCIMA.2001.970475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares segmentation-based and non-segmentation based techniques for cursive word recognition. In our segmentation based technique, every word is segmented into characters, the chain code features are extracted from segmented characters, the features are fed to neural network classifier and finally the words are constructed using a string compare algorithm. In our non-segmentation based technique, the chain code features are extracted directly from words and the words are fed to a neural network classifier to classify them into word classes. To make fair comparison, CEDAR benchmark database is used, and the parameters such as the number of words, thresholding, resizing, feature extraction techniques, etc., are kept same for both the techniques. Experimental results show that the non-segmentation technique achieves much higher recognition rate than the segmentation based technique.","PeriodicalId":232504,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Fourth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications. ICCIMA 2001","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Segmentation vs. non-segmentation based neural techniques for cursive word recognition: an experimental analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xialong Fan, B. Verma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCIMA.2001.970475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares segmentation-based and non-segmentation based techniques for cursive word recognition. In our segmentation based technique, every word is segmented into characters, the chain code features are extracted from segmented characters, the features are fed to neural network classifier and finally the words are constructed using a string compare algorithm. In our non-segmentation based technique, the chain code features are extracted directly from words and the words are fed to a neural network classifier to classify them into word classes. To make fair comparison, CEDAR benchmark database is used, and the parameters such as the number of words, thresholding, resizing, feature extraction techniques, etc., are kept same for both the techniques. Experimental results show that the non-segmentation technique achieves much higher recognition rate than the segmentation based technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Fourth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications. ICCIMA 2001\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Fourth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications. ICCIMA 2001\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIMA.2001.970475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Fourth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications. ICCIMA 2001","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIMA.2001.970475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文比较了基于分词和非分词的草书词识别技术。在基于分词的技术中,首先将每个单词分割成字符,然后从这些字符中提取链码特征,再将这些特征输入到神经网络分类器中,最后使用字符串比较算法构造单词。在我们的非分割技术中,直接从单词中提取链码特征,并将单词输入到神经网络分类器中进行分类。为了进行公平的比较,我们使用了CEDAR基准数据库,两种技术在字数、阈值、调整大小、特征提取技术等参数上保持一致。实验结果表明,非分割技术比基于分割的技术取得了更高的识别率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Segmentation vs. non-segmentation based neural techniques for cursive word recognition: an experimental analysis
This paper compares segmentation-based and non-segmentation based techniques for cursive word recognition. In our segmentation based technique, every word is segmented into characters, the chain code features are extracted from segmented characters, the features are fed to neural network classifier and finally the words are constructed using a string compare algorithm. In our non-segmentation based technique, the chain code features are extracted directly from words and the words are fed to a neural network classifier to classify them into word classes. To make fair comparison, CEDAR benchmark database is used, and the parameters such as the number of words, thresholding, resizing, feature extraction techniques, etc., are kept same for both the techniques. Experimental results show that the non-segmentation technique achieves much higher recognition rate than the segmentation based technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信