语音孤立词识别分类任务中特征提取方法的准确性

A. Messerle, Yu.N. Gorshkov
{"title":"语音孤立词识别分类任务中特征提取方法的准确性","authors":"A. Messerle, Yu.N. Gorshkov","doi":"10.1109/REEPE57272.2023.10086720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents the practical comparing of feature extraction methods in speech by the example of isolated words (commands) recognition and comparing the performance of a set of features using different classification algorithms. In this case, a consistently increasing set of keyword samples is used for the training set. Approaches based on cepstral coefficient extraction (including MFCC- and GFCC-based variations), linear prediction (LPCC), and wavelet transform (via Basilar-membrane Frequency-band) are considered. The obtained results indicate that in some cases (including recognition tasks) the use of features other than MFCC allows to increase the accuracy of recognition from 1 to 7 percent. At the same time, the statements of the authors of other approaches to the extraction of speech features about the significant superiority of their methods over MFCC are not confirmed.","PeriodicalId":356187,"journal":{"name":"2023 5th International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE)","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Feature Extraction Approaches in the Task of Recognition and Classification of Isolated Words in Speech\",\"authors\":\"A. Messerle, Yu.N. Gorshkov\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/REEPE57272.2023.10086720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents the practical comparing of feature extraction methods in speech by the example of isolated words (commands) recognition and comparing the performance of a set of features using different classification algorithms. In this case, a consistently increasing set of keyword samples is used for the training set. Approaches based on cepstral coefficient extraction (including MFCC- and GFCC-based variations), linear prediction (LPCC), and wavelet transform (via Basilar-membrane Frequency-band) are considered. The obtained results indicate that in some cases (including recognition tasks) the use of features other than MFCC allows to increase the accuracy of recognition from 1 to 7 percent. At the same time, the statements of the authors of other approaches to the extraction of speech features about the significant superiority of their methods over MFCC are not confirmed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 5th International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE)\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 5th International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/REEPE57272.2023.10086720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 5th International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REEPE57272.2023.10086720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以孤立词(命令)识别为例,对语音特征提取方法进行了实际比较,并比较了不同分类算法下一组特征的性能。在这种情况下,一个持续增加的关键字样本集被用于训练集。考虑了基于倒谱系数提取(包括基于MFCC和gfcc的变化)、线性预测(LPCC)和小波变换(通过基底膜频带)的方法。所获得的结果表明,在某些情况下(包括识别任务),使用MFCC以外的特征可以将识别的准确率从1%提高到7%。与此同时,其他语音特征提取方法的作者关于他们的方法比MFCC有显著优势的说法没有得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of Feature Extraction Approaches in the Task of Recognition and Classification of Isolated Words in Speech
The paper presents the practical comparing of feature extraction methods in speech by the example of isolated words (commands) recognition and comparing the performance of a set of features using different classification algorithms. In this case, a consistently increasing set of keyword samples is used for the training set. Approaches based on cepstral coefficient extraction (including MFCC- and GFCC-based variations), linear prediction (LPCC), and wavelet transform (via Basilar-membrane Frequency-band) are considered. The obtained results indicate that in some cases (including recognition tasks) the use of features other than MFCC allows to increase the accuracy of recognition from 1 to 7 percent. At the same time, the statements of the authors of other approaches to the extraction of speech features about the significant superiority of their methods over MFCC are not confirmed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信