政府政策对城乡收入不平等的影响

Ximing Wu, J. Perloff, Amos Golan
{"title":"政府政策对城乡收入不平等的影响","authors":"Ximing Wu, J. Perloff, Amos Golan","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4991.2006.00185.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use three conventional inequality indices-the Gini, the coefficient of variation of income, and the relative mean deviation of income-and the Atkinson index to examine the effect of income tax rates, the minimum wage, and all the major government welfare and transfer programs on the evolution of income inequality for rural and urban areas by state from 1981 to 1997. We find that these programs have qualitatively similar but quantitatively different effects on urban and rural areas. Most importantly, taxes are more effective in redistributing income in urban than in rural areas, while welfare and other government transfer programs play a larger role in rural areas. Copyright © 2006 The Authors; Journal compilation © International Association for Research in Income and Wealth 2006.","PeriodicalId":135506,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Urban Design & Planning (Topic)","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Government Policies on Urban and Rural Income Inequality\",\"authors\":\"Ximing Wu, J. Perloff, Amos Golan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1475-4991.2006.00185.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We use three conventional inequality indices-the Gini, the coefficient of variation of income, and the relative mean deviation of income-and the Atkinson index to examine the effect of income tax rates, the minimum wage, and all the major government welfare and transfer programs on the evolution of income inequality for rural and urban areas by state from 1981 to 1997. We find that these programs have qualitatively similar but quantitatively different effects on urban and rural areas. Most importantly, taxes are more effective in redistributing income in urban than in rural areas, while welfare and other government transfer programs play a larger role in rural areas. Copyright © 2006 The Authors; Journal compilation © International Association for Research in Income and Wealth 2006.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Urban Design & Planning (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Urban Design & Planning (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2006.00185.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Urban Design & Planning (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2006.00185.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

我们使用三个传统的不平等指数——基尼系数、收入变动系数和收入相对平均偏差——以及阿特金森指数来检验1981年至1997年各州所得税税率、最低工资以及所有主要的政府福利和转移支付计划对城乡收入不平等演变的影响。我们发现,这些项目对城市和农村地区的影响在质量上相似,但在数量上不同。最重要的是,税收在城市收入再分配方面比在农村地区更有效,而福利和其他政府转移支付项目在农村地区发挥的作用更大。版权所有©2006;期刊汇编©国际收入与财富研究协会2006。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Government Policies on Urban and Rural Income Inequality
We use three conventional inequality indices-the Gini, the coefficient of variation of income, and the relative mean deviation of income-and the Atkinson index to examine the effect of income tax rates, the minimum wage, and all the major government welfare and transfer programs on the evolution of income inequality for rural and urban areas by state from 1981 to 1997. We find that these programs have qualitatively similar but quantitatively different effects on urban and rural areas. Most importantly, taxes are more effective in redistributing income in urban than in rural areas, while welfare and other government transfer programs play a larger role in rural areas. Copyright © 2006 The Authors; Journal compilation © International Association for Research in Income and Wealth 2006.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信