{"title":"结论","authors":"I. Cummins","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781447350590.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter brings together the main themes of the volume. It argues that deinstitutionalisation and community care should be understood as distinct policies – one should follow on from the other, but this has not happened. These policies which have been adopted across the globe were driven by a combination of fiscal conservatism and progressive idealism. Fiscal conservatism was, for most of the period, the dominant force. Community care has become discredited, but it can be reinvigorated by a call to the progressive idealism that underpinned it.","PeriodicalId":191109,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Services and Community Care","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conclusion\",\"authors\":\"I. Cummins\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/policypress/9781447350590.003.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter brings together the main themes of the volume. It argues that deinstitutionalisation and community care should be understood as distinct policies – one should follow on from the other, but this has not happened. These policies which have been adopted across the globe were driven by a combination of fiscal conservatism and progressive idealism. Fiscal conservatism was, for most of the period, the dominant force. Community care has become discredited, but it can be reinvigorated by a call to the progressive idealism that underpinned it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental Health Services and Community Care\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental Health Services and Community Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447350590.003.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Services and Community Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447350590.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter brings together the main themes of the volume. It argues that deinstitutionalisation and community care should be understood as distinct policies – one should follow on from the other, but this has not happened. These policies which have been adopted across the globe were driven by a combination of fiscal conservatism and progressive idealism. Fiscal conservatism was, for most of the period, the dominant force. Community care has become discredited, but it can be reinvigorated by a call to the progressive idealism that underpinned it.