1930-1970年悉尼南部乔治河河口红树林/盐沼分布的变化

R. Haworth
{"title":"1930-1970年悉尼南部乔治河河口红树林/盐沼分布的变化","authors":"R. Haworth","doi":"10.31646/WA.237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aerial photographs taken between 1930 and 1970 of the Georges River in southern Sydney show a rapid advance of mangroves landward (upslope) at the expense of salt-marsh, though the timing and extent of the advances was not the same in all locations. By 1970, in the central estuarine reaches, salt marsh has all but disappeared from the tidal wetlands of the bayhead fluvial-estuarine deltas, surviving only on the more open ‘half moon’ embayments adjacent to the main river, as well as on the Mill Creek delta. In contract, there was little or no advance of the mangroves seaward onto tidal mud flats during this period, except in the one instance of upper Salt Pan Creek, which also contains the highest proportion of erodible shale in its catchment. Salt marsh survived best in wetland sites with least disturbance from urban development and engineering works, strongly pointing to increased urban runoff and nutrient-enriched sediment as key factors accounting for local differences in mangrove advance. \n \nThe confined topography of bayhead sites produced the most complete and earliest changeover to mangroves, probably because they concentrated both runoff and nutrient in comparison to the more open sites near the main river. Mill Creek, with the least urbanised catchment, had areas that represented both geomorphic types, yet significant areas of salt marsh survived in all parts of the wetland. The general upslope advance of mangroves after 1940 in the Georges River is undoubtedly partly associated with the degree and timing of catchment disturbances as Sydney spread southwards. However, despite this local variability, the mid to late 20th Century mangrove advance both in the Georges River and elsewhere in southeast Australia is so widespread that the influence of other forcing agents, such as global sea level rise and regional changes in temperature and rainfall, cannot be ruled out.","PeriodicalId":197128,"journal":{"name":"Wetlands Australia Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in mangrove/saltmarsh distribution in the Georges River estuary, southern Sydney, 1930-1970\",\"authors\":\"R. Haworth\",\"doi\":\"10.31646/WA.237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aerial photographs taken between 1930 and 1970 of the Georges River in southern Sydney show a rapid advance of mangroves landward (upslope) at the expense of salt-marsh, though the timing and extent of the advances was not the same in all locations. By 1970, in the central estuarine reaches, salt marsh has all but disappeared from the tidal wetlands of the bayhead fluvial-estuarine deltas, surviving only on the more open ‘half moon’ embayments adjacent to the main river, as well as on the Mill Creek delta. In contract, there was little or no advance of the mangroves seaward onto tidal mud flats during this period, except in the one instance of upper Salt Pan Creek, which also contains the highest proportion of erodible shale in its catchment. Salt marsh survived best in wetland sites with least disturbance from urban development and engineering works, strongly pointing to increased urban runoff and nutrient-enriched sediment as key factors accounting for local differences in mangrove advance. \\n \\nThe confined topography of bayhead sites produced the most complete and earliest changeover to mangroves, probably because they concentrated both runoff and nutrient in comparison to the more open sites near the main river. Mill Creek, with the least urbanised catchment, had areas that represented both geomorphic types, yet significant areas of salt marsh survived in all parts of the wetland. The general upslope advance of mangroves after 1940 in the Georges River is undoubtedly partly associated with the degree and timing of catchment disturbances as Sydney spread southwards. However, despite this local variability, the mid to late 20th Century mangrove advance both in the Georges River and elsewhere in southeast Australia is so widespread that the influence of other forcing agents, such as global sea level rise and regional changes in temperature and rainfall, cannot be ruled out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wetlands Australia Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wetlands Australia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31646/WA.237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wetlands Australia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31646/WA.237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

1930年至1970年间拍摄的悉尼南部乔治河的航拍照片显示,红树林以盐沼为代价迅速向陆地(上坡)推进,尽管在所有地点推进的时间和程度并不相同。到1970年,在河口中央河段,海湾河口三角洲的潮汐湿地几乎全部消失,只在靠近主河的更开放的“半月”河口和米尔溪三角洲幸存下来。相比之下,在此期间,红树林很少或根本没有向海边的潮汐滩涂推进,除了盐盘溪上游的一个例子,它的集水区也含有最高比例的可蚀页岩。盐沼在受城市发展和工程干扰最小的湿地中存活得最好,这强烈表明城市径流增加和营养丰富的沉积物是造成红树林推进地区差异的关键因素。湾头的狭窄地形产生了最完整和最早的红树林转变,可能是因为与主河附近更开阔的地点相比,它们集中了径流和营养物质。米尔克里克的集水区城市化程度最低,有两种地貌类型的区域,但在湿地的所有部分都保留了大量的盐沼。1940年后乔治河红树林的普遍上坡,无疑部分与悉尼向南扩展时汇水区扰动的程度和时间有关。然而,尽管存在这种局部变化,20世纪中后期在乔治河和澳大利亚东南部其他地方红树林的扩张是如此广泛,以至于不能排除其他强迫因素的影响,如全球海平面上升和区域温度和降雨的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in mangrove/saltmarsh distribution in the Georges River estuary, southern Sydney, 1930-1970
Aerial photographs taken between 1930 and 1970 of the Georges River in southern Sydney show a rapid advance of mangroves landward (upslope) at the expense of salt-marsh, though the timing and extent of the advances was not the same in all locations. By 1970, in the central estuarine reaches, salt marsh has all but disappeared from the tidal wetlands of the bayhead fluvial-estuarine deltas, surviving only on the more open ‘half moon’ embayments adjacent to the main river, as well as on the Mill Creek delta. In contract, there was little or no advance of the mangroves seaward onto tidal mud flats during this period, except in the one instance of upper Salt Pan Creek, which also contains the highest proportion of erodible shale in its catchment. Salt marsh survived best in wetland sites with least disturbance from urban development and engineering works, strongly pointing to increased urban runoff and nutrient-enriched sediment as key factors accounting for local differences in mangrove advance. The confined topography of bayhead sites produced the most complete and earliest changeover to mangroves, probably because they concentrated both runoff and nutrient in comparison to the more open sites near the main river. Mill Creek, with the least urbanised catchment, had areas that represented both geomorphic types, yet significant areas of salt marsh survived in all parts of the wetland. The general upslope advance of mangroves after 1940 in the Georges River is undoubtedly partly associated with the degree and timing of catchment disturbances as Sydney spread southwards. However, despite this local variability, the mid to late 20th Century mangrove advance both in the Georges River and elsewhere in southeast Australia is so widespread that the influence of other forcing agents, such as global sea level rise and regional changes in temperature and rainfall, cannot be ruled out.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信