{"title":"迈蒙尼德风险平价","authors":"Philip Z. Maymin, Zakhar G. Maymin","doi":"10.1080/21649502.2013.865068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on and extending an estate allocation algorithm of twelfth-century philosopher Moses ben Maimon, we show how ‘Maimonides Risk Parity’ can link together the equal-weighted, market capitalisation-weighted, and risk parity portfolios in a unified, elegant, and concise theoretical framework, with only a single intuitive parameter: the portfolio risk. We also compare the empirical performance of Maimonides risk parity with standard risk parity and equal-weighted portfolios using monthly equity and bond returns for the past six decades and find that Maimonides risk parity outperforms risk parity for any value of the portfolio risk, and outperforms the equal-weighted portfolio for most values of portfolio risk. We also discuss the optimal choice of portfolio risk. The superior performance of Maimonides risk parity comes from the algorithm's natural ability to robustly incorporate measurement error of seemingly small estimated risk.","PeriodicalId":438897,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Finance Letters","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maimonides risk parity\",\"authors\":\"Philip Z. Maymin, Zakhar G. Maymin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21649502.2013.865068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on and extending an estate allocation algorithm of twelfth-century philosopher Moses ben Maimon, we show how ‘Maimonides Risk Parity’ can link together the equal-weighted, market capitalisation-weighted, and risk parity portfolios in a unified, elegant, and concise theoretical framework, with only a single intuitive parameter: the portfolio risk. We also compare the empirical performance of Maimonides risk parity with standard risk parity and equal-weighted portfolios using monthly equity and bond returns for the past six decades and find that Maimonides risk parity outperforms risk parity for any value of the portfolio risk, and outperforms the equal-weighted portfolio for most values of portfolio risk. We also discuss the optimal choice of portfolio risk. The superior performance of Maimonides risk parity comes from the algorithm's natural ability to robustly incorporate measurement error of seemingly small estimated risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Finance Letters\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Finance Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21649502.2013.865068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Finance Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21649502.2013.865068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
借鉴并扩展了12世纪哲学家摩西·本·迈蒙(Moses ben Maimon)的遗产分配算法,我们展示了“迈蒙尼德风险平价”如何在一个统一、优雅、简洁的理论框架中将等加权、市值加权和风险平价投资组合联系在一起,只有一个直观的参数:投资组合风险。我们还比较了Maimonides风险平价与标准风险平价和等加权投资组合的经验表现,使用过去六十年的月度股票和债券回报,发现Maimonides风险平价在任何投资组合风险值上都优于风险平价,并且在大多数投资组合风险值上优于等加权投资组合。本文还讨论了投资组合风险的最优选择。迈蒙尼德风险平价的优越性能来自于该算法的自然能力,它可以稳健地将看似很小的估计风险的测量误差纳入其中。
Drawing on and extending an estate allocation algorithm of twelfth-century philosopher Moses ben Maimon, we show how ‘Maimonides Risk Parity’ can link together the equal-weighted, market capitalisation-weighted, and risk parity portfolios in a unified, elegant, and concise theoretical framework, with only a single intuitive parameter: the portfolio risk. We also compare the empirical performance of Maimonides risk parity with standard risk parity and equal-weighted portfolios using monthly equity and bond returns for the past six decades and find that Maimonides risk parity outperforms risk parity for any value of the portfolio risk, and outperforms the equal-weighted portfolio for most values of portfolio risk. We also discuss the optimal choice of portfolio risk. The superior performance of Maimonides risk parity comes from the algorithm's natural ability to robustly incorporate measurement error of seemingly small estimated risk.