{"title":"以利润为导向的生产力变革:评论","authors":"B. Balk","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2910361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a comment on [6]. It is shown that: (1) their ‘profit-Luenberger’ productivity indicator (πL) appears to be identically equal to an empirical, profit-based Bennet quantity indicator, and (2) their ‘price effect’ (PE) is a residual without independent interpretation.","PeriodicalId":236717,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profit-Oriented Productivity Change: A Comment\",\"authors\":\"B. Balk\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2910361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is a comment on [6]. It is shown that: (1) their ‘profit-Luenberger’ productivity indicator (πL) appears to be identically equal to an empirical, profit-based Bennet quantity indicator, and (2) their ‘price effect’ (PE) is a residual without independent interpretation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2910361\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Firm Choice & Growth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2910361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper is a comment on [6]. It is shown that: (1) their ‘profit-Luenberger’ productivity indicator (πL) appears to be identically equal to an empirical, profit-based Bennet quantity indicator, and (2) their ‘price effect’ (PE) is a residual without independent interpretation.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
