针对基于签名的检测的混淆技术:一个案例研究

G. Canfora, Andrea Di Sorbo, F. Mercaldo, C. A. Visaggio
{"title":"针对基于签名的检测的混淆技术:一个案例研究","authors":"G. Canfora, Andrea Di Sorbo, F. Mercaldo, C. A. Visaggio","doi":"10.1109/MST.2015.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Android malware is increasingly growing interms of complexity. In order to evade signature-based detection, which represents the most adopted technique by current antimalware vendors, malware writers begin to deploy malware with the ability to change their code as they propagate.In this paper, our aim is to evaluate the robustness of Android antimalware tools when various evasion techniques are used to obfuscate malicious payloads. To support this assessment we realized a tool which applies a number of common transformations on the code of malware applications, and applied these transformations to about 5000 malware apps. Our results demonstrate that, after the code transformations, the malware is not detected by a large set of antimalware tools,even when, before applying the transformations, malware was correctly identified by most antimalware tools. Such outcomes suggest that malware detection methods must be quickly re-designed for protecting successfully smart devices.","PeriodicalId":252572,"journal":{"name":"2015 Mobile Systems Technologies Workshop (MST)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obfuscation Techniques against Signature-Based Detection: A Case Study\",\"authors\":\"G. Canfora, Andrea Di Sorbo, F. Mercaldo, C. A. Visaggio\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MST.2015.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Android malware is increasingly growing interms of complexity. In order to evade signature-based detection, which represents the most adopted technique by current antimalware vendors, malware writers begin to deploy malware with the ability to change their code as they propagate.In this paper, our aim is to evaluate the robustness of Android antimalware tools when various evasion techniques are used to obfuscate malicious payloads. To support this assessment we realized a tool which applies a number of common transformations on the code of malware applications, and applied these transformations to about 5000 malware apps. Our results demonstrate that, after the code transformations, the malware is not detected by a large set of antimalware tools,even when, before applying the transformations, malware was correctly identified by most antimalware tools. Such outcomes suggest that malware detection methods must be quickly re-designed for protecting successfully smart devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 Mobile Systems Technologies Workshop (MST)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 Mobile Systems Technologies Workshop (MST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MST.2015.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Mobile Systems Technologies Workshop (MST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MST.2015.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

摘要

Android恶意软件越来越复杂。为了逃避基于签名的检测,这是目前反恶意软件供应商采用最多的技术,恶意软件编写者开始部署具有在传播过程中更改代码能力的恶意软件。在本文中,我们的目的是评估当使用各种规避技术来混淆恶意有效载荷时,Android反恶意软件工具的鲁棒性。为了支持这一评估,我们实现了一个工具,它对恶意软件应用程序的代码应用了许多常见的转换,并将这些转换应用于大约5000个恶意软件应用程序。我们的结果表明,在代码转换之后,恶意软件没有被大量反恶意软件工具检测到,即使在应用转换之前,恶意软件被大多数反恶意软件工具正确识别。这些结果表明,恶意软件检测方法必须迅速重新设计,以成功保护智能设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obfuscation Techniques against Signature-Based Detection: A Case Study
Android malware is increasingly growing interms of complexity. In order to evade signature-based detection, which represents the most adopted technique by current antimalware vendors, malware writers begin to deploy malware with the ability to change their code as they propagate.In this paper, our aim is to evaluate the robustness of Android antimalware tools when various evasion techniques are used to obfuscate malicious payloads. To support this assessment we realized a tool which applies a number of common transformations on the code of malware applications, and applied these transformations to about 5000 malware apps. Our results demonstrate that, after the code transformations, the malware is not detected by a large set of antimalware tools,even when, before applying the transformations, malware was correctly identified by most antimalware tools. Such outcomes suggest that malware detection methods must be quickly re-designed for protecting successfully smart devices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信