J. Henry, James P. Cain
{"title":"对完美的和正确的软件维护进行定量比较","authors":"J. Henry, James P. Cain","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1096-908X(199709/10)9:5%3C281::AID-SMR154%3E3.0.CO;2-P","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a quantitative comparison of perfective and corrective software maintenance performed by a large military contractor using a formal program release process. The analysis techniques used in the comparison make use of basic data collected throughout the maintenance process. The data collected allow the impact of performing perfective and corrective maintenance to be quantitatively compared. Both parametric and non-parametric statistical techniques are applied to test relationships between and among process and product data. The results provide valuable information for predicting future process and product characteristics, assessing perfective and corrective maintenance impact, and quantitatively comparing the impact of both types of requirements volatility. The results also support one common rule of thumb, cast some doubt on another, and lead to the formulation of a new one. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":383619,"journal":{"name":"J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract.","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A quantitative comparison of perfective and corrective software maintenance\",\"authors\":\"J. Henry, James P. Cain\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1096-908X(199709/10)9:5%3C281::AID-SMR154%3E3.0.CO;2-P\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a quantitative comparison of perfective and corrective software maintenance performed by a large military contractor using a formal program release process. The analysis techniques used in the comparison make use of basic data collected throughout the maintenance process. The data collected allow the impact of performing perfective and corrective maintenance to be quantitatively compared. Both parametric and non-parametric statistical techniques are applied to test relationships between and among process and product data. The results provide valuable information for predicting future process and product characteristics, assessing perfective and corrective maintenance impact, and quantitatively comparing the impact of both types of requirements volatility. The results also support one common rule of thumb, cast some doubt on another, and lead to the formulation of a new one. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract.\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-908X(199709/10)9:5%3C281::AID-SMR154%3E3.0.CO;2-P\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-908X(199709/10)9:5%3C281::AID-SMR154%3E3.0.CO;2-P","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
