关于对现行木结构构件弯曲计算规范文件的改进

S. Gomon, S. Homon, A. Pavluk, Y.V. Puhash
{"title":"关于对现行木结构构件弯曲计算规范文件的改进","authors":"S. Gomon, S. Homon, A. Pavluk, Y.V. Puhash","doi":"10.31650/2707-3068-2023-27-67-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most common use of wood in construction is for bending elements. The calculation of bending members made of glued laminated timber requires the use of the section modulus of this member and the calculated values of the bending strength of the timber. The design bending strength of wood is determined based on the characteristic values obtained from the laws of elastic material under load. However, this statement completely contradicts the anisotropy of wood in its tensile and compressive behavior. If it is known that wood works 90-95% to failure in longitudinal tension, it is then it can be assumed that it is elastic at all. However, in longitudinal deformation, there is non-linear behavior with increasing elastic and plastic strains. Furthermore, the longitudinal tensile strength of wood is almost twice that of longitudinal compression. Therefore, even if the relative deformations in the wood are the same different compressive and tensile stresses arise in the bending element, i.e. . Many authors who have carried out experimental and theoretical studies on the performance of timber beams have pointed out that the neutral force line in the cross-section of the element in direct transverse bending, with increasing levels of single load, shifts towards the tensile zone. Therefore, using the moment of resistance of the cross section in the wooden element to determine the section modulus is incorrect. The moment of resistance of a section of a timber member is only determined if the centre of gravity of the section coincides with the centre of force line. Usually, the failure of long wooden beams ( ) in transverse bending usually occurs due to the fracture of the most stressed outer layers of wood in the of the tensile area and is brittle in nature. It is on such elements that the the temporary bending strength. It is on such elements that the bending strength is crucial. However, the values of , usually determined in the outermost wood layers of the tensile zone, based on the condition, only reach values of 70-75% of the longitudinal tensile strength of wood . It is not possible to determine the tensile strength of wood at this stress level. Therefore, the results of determining the bending strength of wood using the moment of resistance of the cross-section of a timber element determined in the limiting condition are erroneous due to the impossibility of establishing values","PeriodicalId":365885,"journal":{"name":"Modern structures of metal and wood","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"REGARDING THE IMPROVEMENT OF CURRENT NORMATIVE DOCUMENTS FOR THE CALCULATION OF BENDING WOODEN ELEMENTS AND STRUCTURES\",\"authors\":\"S. Gomon, S. Homon, A. Pavluk, Y.V. Puhash\",\"doi\":\"10.31650/2707-3068-2023-27-67-74\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most common use of wood in construction is for bending elements. The calculation of bending members made of glued laminated timber requires the use of the section modulus of this member and the calculated values of the bending strength of the timber. The design bending strength of wood is determined based on the characteristic values obtained from the laws of elastic material under load. However, this statement completely contradicts the anisotropy of wood in its tensile and compressive behavior. If it is known that wood works 90-95% to failure in longitudinal tension, it is then it can be assumed that it is elastic at all. However, in longitudinal deformation, there is non-linear behavior with increasing elastic and plastic strains. Furthermore, the longitudinal tensile strength of wood is almost twice that of longitudinal compression. Therefore, even if the relative deformations in the wood are the same different compressive and tensile stresses arise in the bending element, i.e. . Many authors who have carried out experimental and theoretical studies on the performance of timber beams have pointed out that the neutral force line in the cross-section of the element in direct transverse bending, with increasing levels of single load, shifts towards the tensile zone. Therefore, using the moment of resistance of the cross section in the wooden element to determine the section modulus is incorrect. The moment of resistance of a section of a timber member is only determined if the centre of gravity of the section coincides with the centre of force line. Usually, the failure of long wooden beams ( ) in transverse bending usually occurs due to the fracture of the most stressed outer layers of wood in the of the tensile area and is brittle in nature. It is on such elements that the the temporary bending strength. It is on such elements that the bending strength is crucial. However, the values of , usually determined in the outermost wood layers of the tensile zone, based on the condition, only reach values of 70-75% of the longitudinal tensile strength of wood . It is not possible to determine the tensile strength of wood at this stress level. Therefore, the results of determining the bending strength of wood using the moment of resistance of the cross-section of a timber element determined in the limiting condition are erroneous due to the impossibility of establishing values\",\"PeriodicalId\":365885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern structures of metal and wood\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern structures of metal and wood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31650/2707-3068-2023-27-67-74\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern structures of metal and wood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31650/2707-3068-2023-27-67-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

木材在建筑中最常见的用途是用于弯曲元件。用胶合层合木材制作的抗弯构件的计算,需要使用该构件的截面模量和木材抗弯强度的计算值。木材的设计抗弯强度是根据弹性材料在荷载作用下的特性值确定的。然而,这种说法完全违背了木材在拉伸和压缩行为上的各向异性。如果已知木材在纵向拉伸下90-95%会失效,那么就可以假设它是有弹性的。然而,在纵向变形中,随着弹塑性应变的增加,存在非线性行为。此外,木材的纵向拉伸强度几乎是纵向压缩强度的两倍。因此,即使木材的相对变形相同,弯曲单元也会产生不同的压应力和拉应力,即。许多对木梁性能进行试验和理论研究的作者指出,在直接横向弯曲下,随着单荷载水平的增加,构件截面上的中性力线向受拉区移动。因此,用木构件中截面的阻力矩来确定截面模量是不正确的。一段木材构件的阻力矩只有在该部分的重心与力线的中心重合时才确定。通常情况下,长木梁()在横向弯曲中的破坏通常是由于受拉区中受应力最大的外层木材断裂而发生的,并且具有脆性。临时抗弯强度就是建立在这样的基础上的。正是在这些元素上,弯曲强度是至关重要的。然而,通常在拉伸区最外层的木材层中确定的值,根据条件,只能达到木材纵向拉伸强度的70-75%。在这种应力水平下,不可能确定木材的抗拉强度。因此,使用在极限条件下确定的木材元件截面的阻力矩来确定木材的抗弯强度的结果是错误的,因为无法建立值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
REGARDING THE IMPROVEMENT OF CURRENT NORMATIVE DOCUMENTS FOR THE CALCULATION OF BENDING WOODEN ELEMENTS AND STRUCTURES
The most common use of wood in construction is for bending elements. The calculation of bending members made of glued laminated timber requires the use of the section modulus of this member and the calculated values of the bending strength of the timber. The design bending strength of wood is determined based on the characteristic values obtained from the laws of elastic material under load. However, this statement completely contradicts the anisotropy of wood in its tensile and compressive behavior. If it is known that wood works 90-95% to failure in longitudinal tension, it is then it can be assumed that it is elastic at all. However, in longitudinal deformation, there is non-linear behavior with increasing elastic and plastic strains. Furthermore, the longitudinal tensile strength of wood is almost twice that of longitudinal compression. Therefore, even if the relative deformations in the wood are the same different compressive and tensile stresses arise in the bending element, i.e. . Many authors who have carried out experimental and theoretical studies on the performance of timber beams have pointed out that the neutral force line in the cross-section of the element in direct transverse bending, with increasing levels of single load, shifts towards the tensile zone. Therefore, using the moment of resistance of the cross section in the wooden element to determine the section modulus is incorrect. The moment of resistance of a section of a timber member is only determined if the centre of gravity of the section coincides with the centre of force line. Usually, the failure of long wooden beams ( ) in transverse bending usually occurs due to the fracture of the most stressed outer layers of wood in the of the tensile area and is brittle in nature. It is on such elements that the the temporary bending strength. It is on such elements that the bending strength is crucial. However, the values of , usually determined in the outermost wood layers of the tensile zone, based on the condition, only reach values of 70-75% of the longitudinal tensile strength of wood . It is not possible to determine the tensile strength of wood at this stress level. Therefore, the results of determining the bending strength of wood using the moment of resistance of the cross-section of a timber element determined in the limiting condition are erroneous due to the impossibility of establishing values
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信