现金收益关系是否存在风险?

Chenxin Liu
{"title":"现金收益关系是否存在风险?","authors":"Chenxin Liu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2900072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Palazzo [2012] finds a positive relation between cash holdings and stock return and attributes this to the association between cash and systematic risk with respect to growth options. In this paper, I try to test whether the relation between cash and return is driven by systematic risk that captured by cash. The empirical results do not support the risk explanation of cash-return relation. First, the loadings on CASH factor cannot predict returns, which is not consistent with rational frictionless asset pricing models. Second, CASH factor cannot reflect future GDP growth. Third, CASH and its factor loadings exhibit no association with implied cost of capital derived from analysts’ earnings forecasts. Overall, this paper casts doubt on the argument that cash can serve as a proxy of systematic risk in the explanation of cross sectional variation in stock returns.","PeriodicalId":151026,"journal":{"name":"Singapore Management University Lee Kong Chian School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Cash-Return Relation Risk Induced?\",\"authors\":\"Chenxin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2900072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Palazzo [2012] finds a positive relation between cash holdings and stock return and attributes this to the association between cash and systematic risk with respect to growth options. In this paper, I try to test whether the relation between cash and return is driven by systematic risk that captured by cash. The empirical results do not support the risk explanation of cash-return relation. First, the loadings on CASH factor cannot predict returns, which is not consistent with rational frictionless asset pricing models. Second, CASH factor cannot reflect future GDP growth. Third, CASH and its factor loadings exhibit no association with implied cost of capital derived from analysts’ earnings forecasts. Overall, this paper casts doubt on the argument that cash can serve as a proxy of systematic risk in the explanation of cross sectional variation in stock returns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Singapore Management University Lee Kong Chian School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Singapore Management University Lee Kong Chian School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2900072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore Management University Lee Kong Chian School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2900072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Palazzo[2012]发现现金持有量与股票收益之间存在正相关关系,并将其归因于现金与成长期权方面的系统风险之间的关联。在本文中,我试图检验现金与收益之间的关系是否由现金捕获的系统风险驱动。实证结果不支持现金收益关系的风险解释。首先,现金因子的负荷不能预测收益,这与理性无摩擦资产定价模型不一致。第二,现金因素不能反映未来GDP增长。第三,现金及其因子负荷与分析师收益预测得出的隐含资本成本没有关联。总体而言,本文对现金可以作为系统风险的代理来解释股票收益横截面变化的观点提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Cash-Return Relation Risk Induced?
Palazzo [2012] finds a positive relation between cash holdings and stock return and attributes this to the association between cash and systematic risk with respect to growth options. In this paper, I try to test whether the relation between cash and return is driven by systematic risk that captured by cash. The empirical results do not support the risk explanation of cash-return relation. First, the loadings on CASH factor cannot predict returns, which is not consistent with rational frictionless asset pricing models. Second, CASH factor cannot reflect future GDP growth. Third, CASH and its factor loadings exhibit no association with implied cost of capital derived from analysts’ earnings forecasts. Overall, this paper casts doubt on the argument that cash can serve as a proxy of systematic risk in the explanation of cross sectional variation in stock returns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信