日志文件的剖析:信息问责措施的含义

C. Wickramage, T. Sahama, C. Fidge
{"title":"日志文件的剖析:信息问责措施的含义","authors":"C. Wickramage, T. Sahama, C. Fidge","doi":"10.1109/HealthCom.2016.7749426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the growing use of digital technologies and Electronic Health Record systems, new auditing mechanisms are needed to help protect stakeholders from information misuse, both deliberate and accidental. Electronic storage of health records and use of sensor networks, wearable and ubiquitous health tracking devices raise numerous privacy related threats for both healthcare providers and their patients. A purely preventive approach to information access is not appropriate in healthcare scenarios, especially during emergencies, so after-the-fact justifications are needed to manage information handling risks in such an environment. To allow such justifications we need to analyse the root causes for unusual human actions or behaviours but current system event logs are inadequate for this purpose. Hence, a better solution would be to generate audit logs sufficient for analysing information use anomalies. Here we explain the limitations of existing event logs in clinical settings when attempting to perform after-the-fact justifications as part of a clinical Information Accountability system. From this we recommend additional features that must be added to event logs to support a healthcare-based Information Accountability Framework.","PeriodicalId":167022,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomy of log files: Implications for information accountability measures\",\"authors\":\"C. Wickramage, T. Sahama, C. Fidge\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HealthCom.2016.7749426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the growing use of digital technologies and Electronic Health Record systems, new auditing mechanisms are needed to help protect stakeholders from information misuse, both deliberate and accidental. Electronic storage of health records and use of sensor networks, wearable and ubiquitous health tracking devices raise numerous privacy related threats for both healthcare providers and their patients. A purely preventive approach to information access is not appropriate in healthcare scenarios, especially during emergencies, so after-the-fact justifications are needed to manage information handling risks in such an environment. To allow such justifications we need to analyse the root causes for unusual human actions or behaviours but current system event logs are inadequate for this purpose. Hence, a better solution would be to generate audit logs sufficient for analysing information use anomalies. Here we explain the limitations of existing event logs in clinical settings when attempting to perform after-the-fact justifications as part of a clinical Information Accountability system. From this we recommend additional features that must be added to event logs to support a healthcare-based Information Accountability Framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HealthCom.2016.7749426\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HealthCom.2016.7749426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

由于越来越多地使用数字技术和电子健康记录系统,需要新的审计机制来帮助保护利益相关者免受蓄意和意外的信息滥用。健康记录的电子存储和传感器网络、可穿戴和无处不在的健康跟踪设备的使用,给医疗保健提供者及其患者带来了许多与隐私相关的威胁。纯预防性的信息访问方法不适用于医疗保健场景,特别是在紧急情况下,因此需要事后证明,以便在这种环境中管理信息处理风险。为了允许这样的理由,我们需要分析不寻常的人类行为或行为的根本原因,但当前的系统事件日志不足以满足此目的。因此,更好的解决方案是生成足以分析信息使用异常的审计日志。在这里,我们解释现有的事件日志在临床设置的局限性,当试图执行事后证明作为临床信息问责制的一部分。据此,我们推荐必须添加到事件日志中的其他功能,以支持基于医疗保健的信息责任框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anatomy of log files: Implications for information accountability measures
Due to the growing use of digital technologies and Electronic Health Record systems, new auditing mechanisms are needed to help protect stakeholders from information misuse, both deliberate and accidental. Electronic storage of health records and use of sensor networks, wearable and ubiquitous health tracking devices raise numerous privacy related threats for both healthcare providers and their patients. A purely preventive approach to information access is not appropriate in healthcare scenarios, especially during emergencies, so after-the-fact justifications are needed to manage information handling risks in such an environment. To allow such justifications we need to analyse the root causes for unusual human actions or behaviours but current system event logs are inadequate for this purpose. Hence, a better solution would be to generate audit logs sufficient for analysing information use anomalies. Here we explain the limitations of existing event logs in clinical settings when attempting to perform after-the-fact justifications as part of a clinical Information Accountability system. From this we recommend additional features that must be added to event logs to support a healthcare-based Information Accountability Framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信