{"title":"上瘾","authors":"Nancy D. Campbell","doi":"10.1017/9781108765961.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Addiction” has been a really intriguing conceptual anchor for a deep dive into the history of how sociologists and economists have thought about it. This chapter was written for a volume edited by Philippe Fontaine and Jefferson Pooley, and titled Society On the Edge: Social Science and Public Policy in the Postwar United States. The book was organized around a novel idea—the editors went through *all* Social Problems textbooks produced from the beginning of this way of organizing the field.","PeriodicalId":168983,"journal":{"name":"Society on the Edge","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addiction\",\"authors\":\"Nancy D. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108765961.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Addiction” has been a really intriguing conceptual anchor for a deep dive into the history of how sociologists and economists have thought about it. This chapter was written for a volume edited by Philippe Fontaine and Jefferson Pooley, and titled Society On the Edge: Social Science and Public Policy in the Postwar United States. The book was organized around a novel idea—the editors went through *all* Social Problems textbooks produced from the beginning of this way of organizing the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Society on the Edge\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Society on the Edge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765961.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society on the Edge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765961.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
“Addiction” has been a really intriguing conceptual anchor for a deep dive into the history of how sociologists and economists have thought about it. This chapter was written for a volume edited by Philippe Fontaine and Jefferson Pooley, and titled Society On the Edge: Social Science and Public Policy in the Postwar United States. The book was organized around a novel idea—the editors went through *all* Social Problems textbooks produced from the beginning of this way of organizing the field.