腹腔镜Roux-en-Y与一次胃旁路吻合对病态肥胖患者糖尿病缓解的影响

O. Abed, A. Kabir, F. Jesmi, L. Janani, P. Alibeigi, M. Abdolhosseini, F. Soheilipour, A. Pazouki
{"title":"腹腔镜Roux-en-Y与一次胃旁路吻合对病态肥胖患者糖尿病缓解的影响","authors":"O. Abed, A. Kabir, F. Jesmi, L. Janani, P. Alibeigi, M. Abdolhosseini, F. Soheilipour, A. Pazouki","doi":"10.5812/MINSURGERY.55991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are common treatments for morbid obese patients who suffer from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). It has been hypothesized that diabetes may be resolved or improved after bariatric procedures, although the exact effect has not been well established. The present study aimed to compare remission of T2DM after LRYGB versus OAGB in this study. Methods: All diabetic obese patients, aged between 16 to 60, who referred to Hazrat Rasul Akram obesity clinic from April 2010 to March 2013 for LRYGB or OAGB were included in the present study. Pre-operative parameters, including glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body mass index (BMI), and type of diabetes medication were extracted from database and recorded. Pre-operative and three months postoperative values were then compared between the groups. Results: Out of 95 eligible patients, 50 patients underwent OAGB and 45 patients had LRYGB. The two groups were homogenous in distribution of gender, mean age, weight, BMI, and FPG; however, mean HbA1C was relatively higher in LRYGB group (P = 0.05) than other group, which was non-significant after adjustment. Rate of remission was significantly higher in OAGB group than other group after three months follow-up (64.0 versus 31.1%, respectively) (P = 0.002). Conclusions: In our short-term follow-up, OAGB had a higher rate of remission of T2DM compared to LRYGB, which could be due to different baseline value of HbA1c (before surgery) between two groups. Future research is thus suggested with linger follow-up and randomized study design.","PeriodicalId":158928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass on Remission of Diabetes in Morbid Obesity\",\"authors\":\"O. Abed, A. Kabir, F. Jesmi, L. Janani, P. Alibeigi, M. Abdolhosseini, F. Soheilipour, A. Pazouki\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/MINSURGERY.55991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are common treatments for morbid obese patients who suffer from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). It has been hypothesized that diabetes may be resolved or improved after bariatric procedures, although the exact effect has not been well established. The present study aimed to compare remission of T2DM after LRYGB versus OAGB in this study. Methods: All diabetic obese patients, aged between 16 to 60, who referred to Hazrat Rasul Akram obesity clinic from April 2010 to March 2013 for LRYGB or OAGB were included in the present study. Pre-operative parameters, including glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body mass index (BMI), and type of diabetes medication were extracted from database and recorded. Pre-operative and three months postoperative values were then compared between the groups. Results: Out of 95 eligible patients, 50 patients underwent OAGB and 45 patients had LRYGB. The two groups were homogenous in distribution of gender, mean age, weight, BMI, and FPG; however, mean HbA1C was relatively higher in LRYGB group (P = 0.05) than other group, which was non-significant after adjustment. Rate of remission was significantly higher in OAGB group than other group after three months follow-up (64.0 versus 31.1%, respectively) (P = 0.002). Conclusions: In our short-term follow-up, OAGB had a higher rate of remission of T2DM compared to LRYGB, which could be due to different baseline value of HbA1c (before surgery) between two groups. Future research is thus suggested with linger follow-up and randomized study design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/MINSURGERY.55991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/MINSURGERY.55991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:腹腔镜一次吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)和腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)是2型糖尿病(T2DM)病态肥胖患者的常用治疗方法。据推测,在减肥手术后,糖尿病可能会得到解决或改善,尽管确切的效果尚未得到很好的证实。本研究旨在比较LRYGB和OAGB治疗后T2DM的缓解情况。方法:选取2010年4月至2013年3月至Hazrat Rasul Akram肥胖诊所就诊的16 ~ 60岁糖尿病肥胖患者进行LRYGB或OAGB检查。从数据库中提取并记录术前参数,包括糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖(FPG)、体重指数(BMI)、糖尿病用药类型。然后比较两组术前和术后3个月的数值。结果:在95例符合条件的患者中,50例患者接受了OAGB, 45例患者接受了LRYGB。两组患者的性别、平均年龄、体重、BMI、FPG分布均匀;而LRYGB组平均HbA1C高于其他组(P = 0.05),经校正后差异无统计学意义。随访3个月后,OAGB组缓解率明显高于其他组(分别为64.0比31.1%)(P = 0.002)。结论:在我们的短期随访中,OAGB组的T2DM缓解率高于LRYGB组,这可能是由于两组HbA1c(术前)基线值不同所致。因此,未来的研究建议采用持续随访和随机研究设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass on Remission of Diabetes in Morbid Obesity
Background: Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) are common treatments for morbid obese patients who suffer from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). It has been hypothesized that diabetes may be resolved or improved after bariatric procedures, although the exact effect has not been well established. The present study aimed to compare remission of T2DM after LRYGB versus OAGB in this study. Methods: All diabetic obese patients, aged between 16 to 60, who referred to Hazrat Rasul Akram obesity clinic from April 2010 to March 2013 for LRYGB or OAGB were included in the present study. Pre-operative parameters, including glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body mass index (BMI), and type of diabetes medication were extracted from database and recorded. Pre-operative and three months postoperative values were then compared between the groups. Results: Out of 95 eligible patients, 50 patients underwent OAGB and 45 patients had LRYGB. The two groups were homogenous in distribution of gender, mean age, weight, BMI, and FPG; however, mean HbA1C was relatively higher in LRYGB group (P = 0.05) than other group, which was non-significant after adjustment. Rate of remission was significantly higher in OAGB group than other group after three months follow-up (64.0 versus 31.1%, respectively) (P = 0.002). Conclusions: In our short-term follow-up, OAGB had a higher rate of remission of T2DM compared to LRYGB, which could be due to different baseline value of HbA1c (before surgery) between two groups. Future research is thus suggested with linger follow-up and randomized study design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信