结合目标模型、专家启发和概率模拟的新技术鉴定

M. Sabetzadeh, D. Falessi, L. Briand, Stefano Di Alesio, D. McGeorge, Vidar Åhjem, Jonas Borg
{"title":"结合目标模型、专家启发和概率模拟的新技术鉴定","authors":"M. Sabetzadeh, D. Falessi, L. Briand, Stefano Di Alesio, D. McGeorge, Vidar Åhjem, Jonas Borg","doi":"10.1109/HASE.2011.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New technologies typically involve innovative aspects that are not addressed by the existing normative standards and hence are not assessable through common certification procedures. To ensure that new technologies can be implemented in a safe and reliable manner, a specific kind of assessment is performed, which in many industries, e.g., the energy sector, is known as Technology Qualification (TQ). TQ aims at demonstrating with an acceptable level of confidence that a new technology will function within specified limits. Expert opinion plays an important role in TQ, both to identify the safety and reliability evidence that needs to be developed, and to interpret the evidence provided. Hence, it is crucial to apply a systematic process for eliciting expert opinions, and to use the opinions for measuring the satisfaction of a technology's safety and reliability objectives. In this paper, drawing on the concept of assurance cases, we propose a goal-based approach for TQ. The approach, which is supported by a software tool, enables analysts to quantitatively reason about the satisfaction of a technology's overall goals and further to identify the aspects that must be improved to increase goal satisfaction. The three main components enabling quantitative assessment are goal models, expert elicitation, and probabilistic simulation. We report on an industrial pilot study where we apply our approach for assessing a new offshore technology.","PeriodicalId":403140,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 13th International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining Goal Models, Expert Elicitation, and Probabilistic Simulation for Qualification of New Technology\",\"authors\":\"M. Sabetzadeh, D. Falessi, L. Briand, Stefano Di Alesio, D. McGeorge, Vidar Åhjem, Jonas Borg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HASE.2011.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New technologies typically involve innovative aspects that are not addressed by the existing normative standards and hence are not assessable through common certification procedures. To ensure that new technologies can be implemented in a safe and reliable manner, a specific kind of assessment is performed, which in many industries, e.g., the energy sector, is known as Technology Qualification (TQ). TQ aims at demonstrating with an acceptable level of confidence that a new technology will function within specified limits. Expert opinion plays an important role in TQ, both to identify the safety and reliability evidence that needs to be developed, and to interpret the evidence provided. Hence, it is crucial to apply a systematic process for eliciting expert opinions, and to use the opinions for measuring the satisfaction of a technology's safety and reliability objectives. In this paper, drawing on the concept of assurance cases, we propose a goal-based approach for TQ. The approach, which is supported by a software tool, enables analysts to quantitatively reason about the satisfaction of a technology's overall goals and further to identify the aspects that must be improved to increase goal satisfaction. The three main components enabling quantitative assessment are goal models, expert elicitation, and probabilistic simulation. We report on an industrial pilot study where we apply our approach for assessing a new offshore technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 13th International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 13th International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HASE.2011.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 13th International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HASE.2011.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

新技术通常涉及现有规范标准未涉及的创新方面,因此无法通过普通认证程序进行评估。为了确保新技术能够以安全和可靠的方式实施,需要进行一种特定的评估,这种评估在许多行业,例如能源部门,被称为技术鉴定(TQ)。TQ旨在以可接受的信心水平证明一项新技术将在规定的限度内发挥作用。专家意见在TQ中发挥着重要作用,既可以确定需要开发的安全性和可靠性证据,也可以解释所提供的证据。因此,至关重要的是应用一个系统的过程来征求专家意见,并使用这些意见来衡量技术的安全性和可靠性目标的满意度。在本文中,我们借鉴保证案例的概念,提出了一种基于目标的TQ方法。该方法由软件工具支持,使分析人员能够定量地推断技术总体目标的满意度,并进一步确定必须改进以增加目标满意度的方面。实现定量评估的三个主要组成部分是目标模型、专家启发和概率模拟。我们报告了一项工业试点研究,在该研究中,我们应用我们的方法来评估一项新的海上技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining Goal Models, Expert Elicitation, and Probabilistic Simulation for Qualification of New Technology
New technologies typically involve innovative aspects that are not addressed by the existing normative standards and hence are not assessable through common certification procedures. To ensure that new technologies can be implemented in a safe and reliable manner, a specific kind of assessment is performed, which in many industries, e.g., the energy sector, is known as Technology Qualification (TQ). TQ aims at demonstrating with an acceptable level of confidence that a new technology will function within specified limits. Expert opinion plays an important role in TQ, both to identify the safety and reliability evidence that needs to be developed, and to interpret the evidence provided. Hence, it is crucial to apply a systematic process for eliciting expert opinions, and to use the opinions for measuring the satisfaction of a technology's safety and reliability objectives. In this paper, drawing on the concept of assurance cases, we propose a goal-based approach for TQ. The approach, which is supported by a software tool, enables analysts to quantitatively reason about the satisfaction of a technology's overall goals and further to identify the aspects that must be improved to increase goal satisfaction. The three main components enabling quantitative assessment are goal models, expert elicitation, and probabilistic simulation. We report on an industrial pilot study where we apply our approach for assessing a new offshore technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信