辅助追踪中的标记

Wentao Wang, Nan Niu, Hui Liu, Yuting Wu
{"title":"辅助追踪中的标记","authors":"Wentao Wang, Nan Niu, Hui Liu, Yuting Wu","doi":"10.1109/SST.2015.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assisted tracing is the process where human analyst vets and makes decisions concerning the automated method's output. Current research reveals human fallibility in this process, and shows that analyst often makes incorrect decisions that lead to inaccurate final trace matrix. To help enhance analyst performance, we leverage tagging in assisted tracing. Specifically, we implement tagging as a front-end feature that allows analysts to freely mark what they feel worth externalizing during tracing. We then carry out an experiment to investigate the tagging practices of 28 student analysts in vetting requirements-to-source-code trace matrices. Our study shows that tagging is readily adopted by analysts, tags produced in tracing follow power laws, and tags greatly enhance the precision of analyst-submitted final trace matrices. Our work opens up new avenues for researching improved ways to foster analyst-tool integration.","PeriodicalId":404877,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Symposium on Software and Systems Traceability","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tagging in Assisted Tracing\",\"authors\":\"Wentao Wang, Nan Niu, Hui Liu, Yuting Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SST.2015.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assisted tracing is the process where human analyst vets and makes decisions concerning the automated method's output. Current research reveals human fallibility in this process, and shows that analyst often makes incorrect decisions that lead to inaccurate final trace matrix. To help enhance analyst performance, we leverage tagging in assisted tracing. Specifically, we implement tagging as a front-end feature that allows analysts to freely mark what they feel worth externalizing during tracing. We then carry out an experiment to investigate the tagging practices of 28 student analysts in vetting requirements-to-source-code trace matrices. Our study shows that tagging is readily adopted by analysts, tags produced in tracing follow power laws, and tags greatly enhance the precision of analyst-submitted final trace matrices. Our work opens up new avenues for researching improved ways to foster analyst-tool integration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Symposium on Software and Systems Traceability\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Symposium on Software and Systems Traceability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SST.2015.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Symposium on Software and Systems Traceability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SST.2015.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

辅助跟踪是人工分析人员对自动化方法的输出进行审查并做出决策的过程。目前的研究揭示了人类在这一过程中的错误,并表明分析人员经常做出不正确的决策,从而导致不准确的最终跟踪矩阵。为了帮助提高分析人员的性能,我们在辅助跟踪中利用了标记。具体来说,我们将标记实现为一个前端特性,允许分析人员在跟踪期间自由标记他们认为值得外部化的内容。然后,我们进行了一项实验,以调查28名学生分析师在审查需求到源代码跟踪矩阵中的标记实践。我们的研究表明,标签很容易被分析人员采用,跟踪中产生的标签遵循幂律,并且标签大大提高了分析人员提交的最终跟踪矩阵的精度。我们的工作为研究促进分析工具集成的改进方法开辟了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tagging in Assisted Tracing
Assisted tracing is the process where human analyst vets and makes decisions concerning the automated method's output. Current research reveals human fallibility in this process, and shows that analyst often makes incorrect decisions that lead to inaccurate final trace matrix. To help enhance analyst performance, we leverage tagging in assisted tracing. Specifically, we implement tagging as a front-end feature that allows analysts to freely mark what they feel worth externalizing during tracing. We then carry out an experiment to investigate the tagging practices of 28 student analysts in vetting requirements-to-source-code trace matrices. Our study shows that tagging is readily adopted by analysts, tags produced in tracing follow power laws, and tags greatly enhance the precision of analyst-submitted final trace matrices. Our work opens up new avenues for researching improved ways to foster analyst-tool integration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信