MIMO信道模型的比较研究

Müge Karaman Çolakoglu, M. Safak
{"title":"MIMO信道模型的比较研究","authors":"Müge Karaman Çolakoglu, M. Safak","doi":"10.1109/SIU.2007.4298863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparison between the outage capacity of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channels predicted by Kronecker and Muller models as a function of the number of scatterers, transmit-and receive antennas. The results show that the channel capacity predictions by the Muller model are higher than those by the Kronecker model. This is because the Muller model is based on single scattering between transmit and receive antenna arrays, while the Kronecker model considers only the double-scattering.","PeriodicalId":315147,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE 15th Signal Processing and Communications Applications","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative Study of MIMO Channel Models\",\"authors\":\"Müge Karaman Çolakoglu, M. Safak\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIU.2007.4298863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparison between the outage capacity of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channels predicted by Kronecker and Muller models as a function of the number of scatterers, transmit-and receive antennas. The results show that the channel capacity predictions by the Muller model are higher than those by the Kronecker model. This is because the Muller model is based on single scattering between transmit and receive antenna arrays, while the Kronecker model considers only the double-scattering.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE 15th Signal Processing and Communications Applications\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE 15th Signal Processing and Communications Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2007.4298863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE 15th Signal Processing and Communications Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2007.4298863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了Kronecker和Muller模型预测的多输入多输出(MIMO)信道的中断容量作为散射体、发射和接收天线数量的函数。结果表明,Muller模型对通道容量的预测高于Kronecker模型。这是因为Muller模型是基于发射和接收天线阵列之间的单次散射,而Kronecker模型只考虑双重散射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative Study of MIMO Channel Models
This paper presents a comparison between the outage capacity of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channels predicted by Kronecker and Muller models as a function of the number of scatterers, transmit-and receive antennas. The results show that the channel capacity predictions by the Muller model are higher than those by the Kronecker model. This is because the Muller model is based on single scattering between transmit and receive antenna arrays, while the Kronecker model considers only the double-scattering.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信