关于确定性因素的概率解释的一些问题

D. Qiu, J. Dudeck
{"title":"关于确定性因素的概率解释的一些问题","authors":"D. Qiu, J. Dudeck","doi":"10.1109/CBMS.1992.245013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some problems identified by J.B. Adams (Mathemat. Biosciences, vol.32, p.177, 1976) in the MYCIN-model are discussed. It is found that these problems are related only with an inappropriate interpretation for certainty factors assigned to rules. This interpretation is purely formal and has no influence upon the actual elicitation and use of such factors. It is pointed out that one of D. Heckerman's (1986) arguments about the MYCIN-model is incorrect. Then, the interpretations for certainty factors given by Heckerman, namely, CF/sub 1/, CF/sub 2/, are critically reviewed. It is shown that similar problems to those in the original MYCIN-model exist also in CF/sub 1/ and CF/sub 2/. This supports further the point of view that certainty factors should not be interpreted as a measure of belief-updating.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":197891,"journal":{"name":"[1992] Proceedings Fifth Annual IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some problems related with probabilistic interpretations for certainty factors\",\"authors\":\"D. Qiu, J. Dudeck\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CBMS.1992.245013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some problems identified by J.B. Adams (Mathemat. Biosciences, vol.32, p.177, 1976) in the MYCIN-model are discussed. It is found that these problems are related only with an inappropriate interpretation for certainty factors assigned to rules. This interpretation is purely formal and has no influence upon the actual elicitation and use of such factors. It is pointed out that one of D. Heckerman's (1986) arguments about the MYCIN-model is incorrect. Then, the interpretations for certainty factors given by Heckerman, namely, CF/sub 1/, CF/sub 2/, are critically reviewed. It is shown that similar problems to those in the original MYCIN-model exist also in CF/sub 1/ and CF/sub 2/. This supports further the point of view that certainty factors should not be interpreted as a measure of belief-updating.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":197891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1992] Proceedings Fifth Annual IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1992] Proceedings Fifth Annual IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.1992.245013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1992] Proceedings Fifth Annual IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.1992.245013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

由J.B.亚当斯(数学)发现的一些问题。生物科学,vol.32, p.177, 1976)在mycin模型进行了讨论。研究发现,这些问题仅与分配给规则的确定性因素的不适当解释有关。这种解释纯粹是形式上的,对这些因素的实际引出和使用没有影响。本文指出,D. Heckerman(1986)关于mycin模型的一个论点是不正确的。然后,批判性地回顾了Heckerman对确定性因素的解释,即CF/sub 1/, CF/sub 2/。结果表明,CF/sub 1/和CF/sub 2/也存在与原始mycin模型相似的问题。这进一步支持了确定性因素不应被解释为信念更新的衡量标准的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Some problems related with probabilistic interpretations for certainty factors
Some problems identified by J.B. Adams (Mathemat. Biosciences, vol.32, p.177, 1976) in the MYCIN-model are discussed. It is found that these problems are related only with an inappropriate interpretation for certainty factors assigned to rules. This interpretation is purely formal and has no influence upon the actual elicitation and use of such factors. It is pointed out that one of D. Heckerman's (1986) arguments about the MYCIN-model is incorrect. Then, the interpretations for certainty factors given by Heckerman, namely, CF/sub 1/, CF/sub 2/, are critically reviewed. It is shown that similar problems to those in the original MYCIN-model exist also in CF/sub 1/ and CF/sub 2/. This supports further the point of view that certainty factors should not be interpreted as a measure of belief-updating.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信