阿拉伯语命名实体识别和变音符系统综述

Muhammad Nabil Rateb, S. Alansary
{"title":"阿拉伯语命名实体识别和变音符系统综述","authors":"Muhammad Nabil Rateb, S. Alansary","doi":"10.1109/ESOLEC54569.2022.10009095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Language technologies are considered a subdivision of the Artificial intelligence (AI) field, which sheds light on how toolkits are programmed to simulate the natural language of humans. Over the last decennia, there has been a unique advancement in the Natura Language Processing (NLP) field, namely regarding the Arabic language. Arabic is the language spoken by almost two billion Muslims worldwide and is one of the six officially acknowledged languages by the UN organization. This paper is dedicated to a survey on three cutting-edge toolkits utilized to process and analyze the Arabic language: Cameltools, Farasa, and Madamira. This paper presents a background on the challenges that have confronted Arabic Natura Language Processing (ANLP), predominantly concerning diacritization, and Named Entity Recognition (NER) systems. Next, it illustrates what are the main components of Cameltools, Farasa, and Madamira. After that, the evaluation processes of the three toolkits shall be presented and their results will be compared. Finally, the paper shall present observations based on the previous comparison. The survey reveals that Camel is the best since it has been inspired by the designs of the best toolkits provided in the field. Farasa outpaces Madamira in all comparisons regarding ANER and Arabic diacritization.","PeriodicalId":179850,"journal":{"name":"2022 20th International Conference on Language Engineering (ESOLEC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Survey on Arabic Named Entity Recognition and Diacritization Systems\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Nabil Rateb, S. Alansary\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESOLEC54569.2022.10009095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Language technologies are considered a subdivision of the Artificial intelligence (AI) field, which sheds light on how toolkits are programmed to simulate the natural language of humans. Over the last decennia, there has been a unique advancement in the Natura Language Processing (NLP) field, namely regarding the Arabic language. Arabic is the language spoken by almost two billion Muslims worldwide and is one of the six officially acknowledged languages by the UN organization. This paper is dedicated to a survey on three cutting-edge toolkits utilized to process and analyze the Arabic language: Cameltools, Farasa, and Madamira. This paper presents a background on the challenges that have confronted Arabic Natura Language Processing (ANLP), predominantly concerning diacritization, and Named Entity Recognition (NER) systems. Next, it illustrates what are the main components of Cameltools, Farasa, and Madamira. After that, the evaluation processes of the three toolkits shall be presented and their results will be compared. Finally, the paper shall present observations based on the previous comparison. The survey reveals that Camel is the best since it has been inspired by the designs of the best toolkits provided in the field. Farasa outpaces Madamira in all comparisons regarding ANER and Arabic diacritization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 20th International Conference on Language Engineering (ESOLEC)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 20th International Conference on Language Engineering (ESOLEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESOLEC54569.2022.10009095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 20th International Conference on Language Engineering (ESOLEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESOLEC54569.2022.10009095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

语言技术被认为是人工智能(AI)领域的一个分支,它揭示了如何编程工具包来模拟人类的自然语言。在过去的十年里,自然语言处理(NLP)领域有了一个独特的进步,即关于阿拉伯语。阿拉伯语是全世界近20亿穆斯林使用的语言,是联合国组织官方承认的六种语言之一。本文致力于调查用于处理和分析阿拉伯语的三个前沿工具包:Cameltools, Farasa和Madamira。本文介绍了阿拉伯语自然语言处理(ANLP)所面临的挑战的背景,主要涉及变音符化和命名实体识别(NER)系统。接下来,它说明了Cameltools, Farasa和Madamira的主要组成部分。然后,介绍三个工具包的评估过程,并对其结果进行比较。最后,本文将根据前面的比较提出观察结果。调查显示,Camel是最好的,因为它的灵感来自于该领域提供的最好的工具包设计。在所有关于ANER和阿拉伯语变音符的比较中,Farasa都超过了Madamira。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Critical Survey on Arabic Named Entity Recognition and Diacritization Systems
Language technologies are considered a subdivision of the Artificial intelligence (AI) field, which sheds light on how toolkits are programmed to simulate the natural language of humans. Over the last decennia, there has been a unique advancement in the Natura Language Processing (NLP) field, namely regarding the Arabic language. Arabic is the language spoken by almost two billion Muslims worldwide and is one of the six officially acknowledged languages by the UN organization. This paper is dedicated to a survey on three cutting-edge toolkits utilized to process and analyze the Arabic language: Cameltools, Farasa, and Madamira. This paper presents a background on the challenges that have confronted Arabic Natura Language Processing (ANLP), predominantly concerning diacritization, and Named Entity Recognition (NER) systems. Next, it illustrates what are the main components of Cameltools, Farasa, and Madamira. After that, the evaluation processes of the three toolkits shall be presented and their results will be compared. Finally, the paper shall present observations based on the previous comparison. The survey reveals that Camel is the best since it has been inspired by the designs of the best toolkits provided in the field. Farasa outpaces Madamira in all comparisons regarding ANER and Arabic diacritization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信