小肠穿孔的诊断和治疗方法:一项回顾性单中心队列研究

Zhenlu Li, Shikuan Li, Changliang Wu, Zhen Liu, Yeying Zhao, J. Luan, Shuishan Miao, Peige Wang
{"title":"小肠穿孔的诊断和治疗方法:一项回顾性单中心队列研究","authors":"Zhenlu Li, Shikuan Li, Changliang Wu, Zhen Liu, Yeying Zhao, J. Luan, Shuishan Miao, Peige Wang","doi":"10.4103/wjsi.wjsi_8_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Free perforation of the small bowel often has a rapid onset, and if left it untreated, can seriously affect a patient's prognosis. Therefore, in order to fully understand the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of small bowel perforation (SBP), a classification of SBPs or treatment recommendations should be performed. Subjects and Methods: A retrospective, monocentric analysis of patients with SBPs was performed for the period of 2018–2022. Results: Over a 5-year period, 65 cases of SBP were documented. Perforation's localization was duodenal, jejunal, ileal, and undocumented. Eight etiologies were differentiated: obstructive (16.9%), ischemic (7.7%), diverticula-related (9.2%), inflammatory (9.2%), malignant (12.4%), traumatic (7.7%), foreign body (3.1%), and idiopathic (33.8%) perforations. Surgery combined with antibiotics was the most commonly used treatment (97.6%). The mortality rate was 6.2%, with a high rate for patients with ischemic and malignant perforations. Discussion: We have established the mature diagnostic and therapeutic treatment. Furthermore, it was found that the shorter the time between admission and operation, the better the prognosis, the better quality of life, with 12.3% ostomy rate. Conclusion: We have presented a comprehensive analysis of 65 patients treated for SBP over a 5year period, suggested a classification system of SBP according to the etiology, and described diagnostic and therapeutic steps for treatment.","PeriodicalId":278234,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Infection","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of small bowel perforation: A retrospective monocentric cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Zhenlu Li, Shikuan Li, Changliang Wu, Zhen Liu, Yeying Zhao, J. Luan, Shuishan Miao, Peige Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/wjsi.wjsi_8_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Free perforation of the small bowel often has a rapid onset, and if left it untreated, can seriously affect a patient's prognosis. Therefore, in order to fully understand the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of small bowel perforation (SBP), a classification of SBPs or treatment recommendations should be performed. Subjects and Methods: A retrospective, monocentric analysis of patients with SBPs was performed for the period of 2018–2022. Results: Over a 5-year period, 65 cases of SBP were documented. Perforation's localization was duodenal, jejunal, ileal, and undocumented. Eight etiologies were differentiated: obstructive (16.9%), ischemic (7.7%), diverticula-related (9.2%), inflammatory (9.2%), malignant (12.4%), traumatic (7.7%), foreign body (3.1%), and idiopathic (33.8%) perforations. Surgery combined with antibiotics was the most commonly used treatment (97.6%). The mortality rate was 6.2%, with a high rate for patients with ischemic and malignant perforations. Discussion: We have established the mature diagnostic and therapeutic treatment. Furthermore, it was found that the shorter the time between admission and operation, the better the prognosis, the better quality of life, with 12.3% ostomy rate. Conclusion: We have presented a comprehensive analysis of 65 patients treated for SBP over a 5year period, suggested a classification system of SBP according to the etiology, and described diagnostic and therapeutic steps for treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":278234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Surgical Infection\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Surgical Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/wjsi.wjsi_8_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/wjsi.wjsi_8_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小肠游离穿孔通常发病迅速,如果不及时治疗,会严重影响患者的预后。因此,为了充分了解小肠穿孔(SBP)的病因、诊断和治疗,需要对SBP进行分类或提出治疗建议。对象和方法:对2018-2022年期间的sbp患者进行回顾性单中心分析。结果:在5年的时间里,记录了65例收缩压。穿孔的定位为十二指肠、空肠、回肠和无证。8种病因被区分为:梗阻性(16.9%)、缺血性(7.7%)、憩室相关性(9.2%)、炎性(9.2%)、恶性(12.4%)、外伤性(7.7%)、异物(3.1%)和特发性(33.8%)穿孔。手术联合抗生素是最常用的治疗方法(97.6%)。死亡率为6.2%,其中缺血性穿孔和恶性穿孔的死亡率较高。讨论:我们已经建立了成熟的诊断和治疗方法。入院至手术时间越短,预后越好,生活质量越好,造口率为12.3%。结论:我们对65例收缩压患者5年来的治疗进行了综合分析,根据病因提出了收缩压的分类系统,并描述了治疗的诊断和治疗步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of small bowel perforation: A retrospective monocentric cohort study
Background: Free perforation of the small bowel often has a rapid onset, and if left it untreated, can seriously affect a patient's prognosis. Therefore, in order to fully understand the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of small bowel perforation (SBP), a classification of SBPs or treatment recommendations should be performed. Subjects and Methods: A retrospective, monocentric analysis of patients with SBPs was performed for the period of 2018–2022. Results: Over a 5-year period, 65 cases of SBP were documented. Perforation's localization was duodenal, jejunal, ileal, and undocumented. Eight etiologies were differentiated: obstructive (16.9%), ischemic (7.7%), diverticula-related (9.2%), inflammatory (9.2%), malignant (12.4%), traumatic (7.7%), foreign body (3.1%), and idiopathic (33.8%) perforations. Surgery combined with antibiotics was the most commonly used treatment (97.6%). The mortality rate was 6.2%, with a high rate for patients with ischemic and malignant perforations. Discussion: We have established the mature diagnostic and therapeutic treatment. Furthermore, it was found that the shorter the time between admission and operation, the better the prognosis, the better quality of life, with 12.3% ostomy rate. Conclusion: We have presented a comprehensive analysis of 65 patients treated for SBP over a 5year period, suggested a classification system of SBP according to the etiology, and described diagnostic and therapeutic steps for treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信