对双性人活动家批评的医学抵抗:信誉前线的行动

J. Charlebois, Vincent Guillot
{"title":"对双性人活动家批评的医学抵抗:信誉前线的行动","authors":"J. Charlebois, Vincent Guillot","doi":"10.14361/9783839430200-019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its establishment in the early 1990s the intersex movement has been attempting to enforce the respect for intersex children’s human right to physical integrity and self-determination, as well as the non-pathologization of intersexuality. However, this has met with strong resistance from the medical community which prefers to reject criticism as subjective and unfounded. Credibility is a central issue in this debate, but it is rarely openly addressed. If the medical profession puts so much store in the quality of its analysis, what happens if we take a closer look?","PeriodicalId":430889,"journal":{"name":"Normed Children","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Resistance to Criticism of Intersex Activists: Operations on the Frontline of Credibility\",\"authors\":\"J. Charlebois, Vincent Guillot\",\"doi\":\"10.14361/9783839430200-019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since its establishment in the early 1990s the intersex movement has been attempting to enforce the respect for intersex children’s human right to physical integrity and self-determination, as well as the non-pathologization of intersexuality. However, this has met with strong resistance from the medical community which prefers to reject criticism as subjective and unfounded. Credibility is a central issue in this debate, but it is rarely openly addressed. If the medical profession puts so much store in the quality of its analysis, what happens if we take a closer look?\",\"PeriodicalId\":430889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Normed Children\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Normed Children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839430200-019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Normed Children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839430200-019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自20世纪90年代初成立以来,双性人运动一直试图加强对双性儿童身体完整和自决的人权的尊重,以及对双性人的非病态化。然而,这遭到了医学界的强烈抵制,他们更愿意将批评视为主观和毫无根据的。信誉是这场辩论的核心问题,但很少有人公开讨论。如果医学界如此重视其分析的质量,那么如果我们仔细观察会发生什么呢?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical Resistance to Criticism of Intersex Activists: Operations on the Frontline of Credibility
Since its establishment in the early 1990s the intersex movement has been attempting to enforce the respect for intersex children’s human right to physical integrity and self-determination, as well as the non-pathologization of intersexuality. However, this has met with strong resistance from the medical community which prefers to reject criticism as subjective and unfounded. Credibility is a central issue in this debate, but it is rarely openly addressed. If the medical profession puts so much store in the quality of its analysis, what happens if we take a closer look?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信