在(网络)空间机器人可以听到你说话:打破音频验证码使用OTS语音识别

Saumya Solanki, Gautam Krishnan, Varshini Sampath, Jason Polakis
{"title":"在(网络)空间机器人可以听到你说话:打破音频验证码使用OTS语音识别","authors":"Saumya Solanki, Gautam Krishnan, Varshini Sampath, Jason Polakis","doi":"10.1145/3128572.3140443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Captchas have become almost ubiquitous as they are commonly deployed by websites as part of their defenses against fraudsters. However visual captchas pose a considerable obstacle to certain groups of users, such as the visually impaired, and that has necessitated the inclusion of more accessible captcha schemes. As a result, many captcha services also offer audio challenges as an alternative. In this paper we conduct an extensive exploration of the audio captcha ecosystem, and present effective low-cost attacks against the audio challenges offered by seven major captcha services. Motivated by the recent advancements in deep learning, we demonstrate how off-the-shelf (OTS) speech recognition services can be misused by attackers for trivially bypassing the most popular audio captchas. Our experimental evaluation highlights the effectiveness of our approach as our AudioBreaker system is able to break all captcha schemes, achieving accuracies of up to 98.3% against Google's ReCaptcha. The broader implications of our study are twofold. First, we find that the wide availability of advanced speech recognition services has severely lowered the technical capabilities required by fraudsters for deploying effective attacks, as there is no longer a need to build sophisticated custom classifiers. Second, we find that the availability of audio captchas poses a significant risk to services, as our attacks against ReCaptcha's audio challenges are 13.1%-27.5% more accurate than state-of-the-art attacks against the corresponding image-based challenges. Overall, we argue that it is necessary to explore alternative captcha designs that fulfill the accessibility properties of audio captchas without undermining the security offered by their visual counterparts.","PeriodicalId":318259,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In (Cyber)Space Bots Can Hear You Speak: Breaking Audio CAPTCHAs Using OTS Speech Recognition\",\"authors\":\"Saumya Solanki, Gautam Krishnan, Varshini Sampath, Jason Polakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3128572.3140443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Captchas have become almost ubiquitous as they are commonly deployed by websites as part of their defenses against fraudsters. However visual captchas pose a considerable obstacle to certain groups of users, such as the visually impaired, and that has necessitated the inclusion of more accessible captcha schemes. As a result, many captcha services also offer audio challenges as an alternative. In this paper we conduct an extensive exploration of the audio captcha ecosystem, and present effective low-cost attacks against the audio challenges offered by seven major captcha services. Motivated by the recent advancements in deep learning, we demonstrate how off-the-shelf (OTS) speech recognition services can be misused by attackers for trivially bypassing the most popular audio captchas. Our experimental evaluation highlights the effectiveness of our approach as our AudioBreaker system is able to break all captcha schemes, achieving accuracies of up to 98.3% against Google's ReCaptcha. The broader implications of our study are twofold. First, we find that the wide availability of advanced speech recognition services has severely lowered the technical capabilities required by fraudsters for deploying effective attacks, as there is no longer a need to build sophisticated custom classifiers. Second, we find that the availability of audio captchas poses a significant risk to services, as our attacks against ReCaptcha's audio challenges are 13.1%-27.5% more accurate than state-of-the-art attacks against the corresponding image-based challenges. Overall, we argue that it is necessary to explore alternative captcha designs that fulfill the accessibility properties of audio captchas without undermining the security offered by their visual counterparts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3128572.3140443\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3128572.3140443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

验证码已经变得几乎无处不在,因为它们通常被网站部署,作为防御欺诈者的一部分。然而,视觉验证码对某些用户群体(如视障人士)构成了相当大的障碍,这就需要包含更容易访问的验证码方案。因此,许多验证码服务也提供音频挑战作为替代方案。在本文中,我们对音频验证码生态系统进行了广泛的探索,并提出了针对七种主要验证码服务提供的音频挑战的有效低成本攻击。在深度学习最新进展的推动下,我们展示了现成的(OTS)语音识别服务如何被攻击者滥用,以轻松绕过最流行的音频验证码。我们的实验评估强调了我们方法的有效性,因为我们的AudioBreaker系统能够打破所有验证码方案,对b谷歌的验证码实现高达98.3%的准确率。我们的研究有两个更广泛的含义。首先,我们发现先进语音识别服务的广泛可用性严重降低了欺诈者部署有效攻击所需的技术能力,因为不再需要构建复杂的自定义分类器。其次,我们发现音频验证码的可用性对服务构成了重大风险,因为我们针对音频验证码的攻击比针对相应基于图像的挑战的最先进攻击的准确率高13.1%-27.5%。总的来说,我们认为有必要探索替代验证码设计,以满足音频验证码的可访问性属性,而不会破坏其视觉对应物提供的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In (Cyber)Space Bots Can Hear You Speak: Breaking Audio CAPTCHAs Using OTS Speech Recognition
Captchas have become almost ubiquitous as they are commonly deployed by websites as part of their defenses against fraudsters. However visual captchas pose a considerable obstacle to certain groups of users, such as the visually impaired, and that has necessitated the inclusion of more accessible captcha schemes. As a result, many captcha services also offer audio challenges as an alternative. In this paper we conduct an extensive exploration of the audio captcha ecosystem, and present effective low-cost attacks against the audio challenges offered by seven major captcha services. Motivated by the recent advancements in deep learning, we demonstrate how off-the-shelf (OTS) speech recognition services can be misused by attackers for trivially bypassing the most popular audio captchas. Our experimental evaluation highlights the effectiveness of our approach as our AudioBreaker system is able to break all captcha schemes, achieving accuracies of up to 98.3% against Google's ReCaptcha. The broader implications of our study are twofold. First, we find that the wide availability of advanced speech recognition services has severely lowered the technical capabilities required by fraudsters for deploying effective attacks, as there is no longer a need to build sophisticated custom classifiers. Second, we find that the availability of audio captchas poses a significant risk to services, as our attacks against ReCaptcha's audio challenges are 13.1%-27.5% more accurate than state-of-the-art attacks against the corresponding image-based challenges. Overall, we argue that it is necessary to explore alternative captcha designs that fulfill the accessibility properties of audio captchas without undermining the security offered by their visual counterparts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信