奥利金和奥古斯丁

L. Ayres
{"title":"奥利金和奥古斯丁","authors":"L. Ayres","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199566273.013.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the foundation of Catholic theology are to be found Origen of Alexandria and Augustine of Hippo. They are so foundational not, most importantly, because of their positions on particular theological questions, but because of their conception of theological thinking itself. Both articulate accounts of the role of attention to Scripture and the use of philosophical reasoning that are formative in the centuries that follow. Both thinkers were original geniuses who also represent the approach of earlier Christian traditions. Widespread controversy over Origen’s thought throughout the Christian world means that Augustine’s conception of theology can also be understood as something of a corrective to his predecessor (even if this is often unconscious).","PeriodicalId":419079,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Catholic Theology","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Origen and Augustine\",\"authors\":\"L. Ayres\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199566273.013.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the foundation of Catholic theology are to be found Origen of Alexandria and Augustine of Hippo. They are so foundational not, most importantly, because of their positions on particular theological questions, but because of their conception of theological thinking itself. Both articulate accounts of the role of attention to Scripture and the use of philosophical reasoning that are formative in the centuries that follow. Both thinkers were original geniuses who also represent the approach of earlier Christian traditions. Widespread controversy over Origen’s thought throughout the Christian world means that Augustine’s conception of theology can also be understood as something of a corrective to his predecessor (even if this is often unconscious).\",\"PeriodicalId\":419079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Catholic Theology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Catholic Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199566273.013.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Catholic Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199566273.013.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在天主教神学的基础上,可以发现奥利金的亚历山大和奥古斯丁的河马。最重要的是,他们如此奠基,不是因为他们对特定神学问题的立场,而是因为他们对神学思考本身的观念。两者都清楚地说明了对圣经的关注和对哲学推理的使用在随后的几个世纪中形成的作用。两位思想家都是原创的天才,他们也代表了早期基督教传统的方法。在整个基督教世界,对奥利金思想的广泛争论意味着奥古斯丁的神学概念也可以被理解为对他的前任的某种纠正(即使这通常是无意识的)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Origen and Augustine
At the foundation of Catholic theology are to be found Origen of Alexandria and Augustine of Hippo. They are so foundational not, most importantly, because of their positions on particular theological questions, but because of their conception of theological thinking itself. Both articulate accounts of the role of attention to Scripture and the use of philosophical reasoning that are formative in the centuries that follow. Both thinkers were original geniuses who also represent the approach of earlier Christian traditions. Widespread controversy over Origen’s thought throughout the Christian world means that Augustine’s conception of theology can also be understood as something of a corrective to his predecessor (even if this is often unconscious).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信