使用k -最近邻和Naïve贝叶斯分类器方法对印度尼西亚社区反对实施加强疫苗接种的情绪的比较分析

Budiman Budiman, Wulandari Wulandari, Chairul Habibi
{"title":"使用k -最近邻和Naïve贝叶斯分类器方法对印度尼西亚社区反对实施加强疫苗接种的情绪的比较分析","authors":"Budiman Budiman, Wulandari Wulandari, Chairul Habibi","doi":"10.46336/ijeer.v3i3.462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sentiment analysis is a person's opinion or view of a particular object that produces positive, negative, or neutral sentiments. The government's effort during the COVID-19 pandemic is to call for the implementation of a booster vaccination program to the public. Based on this, it produces several public sentiments, some of which are uploaded on the Twitter social media platform, which generate positive and negative sentiments. To find out the classification of public sentiment, the researchers carried out calculations using the K-Nearest Neighbor and Naïve Bayes Classifier methods. Based on the calculation results, it was found that the public sentiment was positive at 98% and negative at 2%. This means that the community is enthusiastic and supports the booster vaccination program. Then the comparison based on the calculation results, namely the K-Nearest Neighbor method with a K value of 3 resulting in an accuracy calculation of 97.33% and using the Naïve Bayes Classifier method, an accuracy calculation of 97.35% can be generated. So it can be seen that using the Naïve Bayes Classifier method has a higher accuracy than the K-Nearest Neighbor method. ","PeriodicalId":191312,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Ethno-Sciences and Education Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Community Sentiment Against the Implementation of Booster Vaccination in Indonesia Using the K-Nearest Neighbor and Naïve Bayes Classifier Methods\",\"authors\":\"Budiman Budiman, Wulandari Wulandari, Chairul Habibi\",\"doi\":\"10.46336/ijeer.v3i3.462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sentiment analysis is a person's opinion or view of a particular object that produces positive, negative, or neutral sentiments. The government's effort during the COVID-19 pandemic is to call for the implementation of a booster vaccination program to the public. Based on this, it produces several public sentiments, some of which are uploaded on the Twitter social media platform, which generate positive and negative sentiments. To find out the classification of public sentiment, the researchers carried out calculations using the K-Nearest Neighbor and Naïve Bayes Classifier methods. Based on the calculation results, it was found that the public sentiment was positive at 98% and negative at 2%. This means that the community is enthusiastic and supports the booster vaccination program. Then the comparison based on the calculation results, namely the K-Nearest Neighbor method with a K value of 3 resulting in an accuracy calculation of 97.33% and using the Naïve Bayes Classifier method, an accuracy calculation of 97.35% can be generated. So it can be seen that using the Naïve Bayes Classifier method has a higher accuracy than the K-Nearest Neighbor method. \",\"PeriodicalId\":191312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Ethno-Sciences and Education Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Ethno-Sciences and Education Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46336/ijeer.v3i3.462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Ethno-Sciences and Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46336/ijeer.v3i3.462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

情感分析是一个人对特定对象的看法或看法,会产生积极、消极或中性的情绪。在新冠疫情期间,政府的努力是向公众呼吁实施加强疫苗接种计划。基于此,它产生了一些公众情绪,其中一些被上传到Twitter社交媒体平台上,产生了积极和消极的情绪。为了找出公众情绪的分类,研究人员使用k近邻和Naïve贝叶斯分类器方法进行了计算。根据计算结果,国民的评价为肯定的占98%,否定的占2%。这意味着社区是热情和支持加强疫苗接种计划。然后根据计算结果进行比较,即K值为3的K- nearest Neighbor方法得到的准确率计算值为97.33%,使用Naïve Bayes Classifier方法得到的准确率计算值为97.35%。由此可见,使用Naïve贝叶斯分类器方法比k -最近邻方法具有更高的准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Community Sentiment Against the Implementation of Booster Vaccination in Indonesia Using the K-Nearest Neighbor and Naïve Bayes Classifier Methods
Sentiment analysis is a person's opinion or view of a particular object that produces positive, negative, or neutral sentiments. The government's effort during the COVID-19 pandemic is to call for the implementation of a booster vaccination program to the public. Based on this, it produces several public sentiments, some of which are uploaded on the Twitter social media platform, which generate positive and negative sentiments. To find out the classification of public sentiment, the researchers carried out calculations using the K-Nearest Neighbor and Naïve Bayes Classifier methods. Based on the calculation results, it was found that the public sentiment was positive at 98% and negative at 2%. This means that the community is enthusiastic and supports the booster vaccination program. Then the comparison based on the calculation results, namely the K-Nearest Neighbor method with a K value of 3 resulting in an accuracy calculation of 97.33% and using the Naïve Bayes Classifier method, an accuracy calculation of 97.35% can be generated. So it can be seen that using the Naïve Bayes Classifier method has a higher accuracy than the K-Nearest Neighbor method. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信