赞成与反对奇点:库兹韦尔的理论及其批评者

Bogdan Popoveniuc
{"title":"赞成与反对奇点:库兹韦尔的理论及其批评者","authors":"Bogdan Popoveniuc","doi":"10.1145/2466816.2466848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper reviews and resumes the \"panoply\" of criticism triggered by Ray Kurzweil's worrying scenario about the forthcoming Technological Singularity. These debates on technological evolution are re-considered and re-evaluated from the perspective of philosophical anthropology. Genuine enquiries on this subject are taken up as well.","PeriodicalId":308845,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference: Laval Virtual","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pro and cons singularity: Kurzweil's theory and its critics\",\"authors\":\"Bogdan Popoveniuc\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2466816.2466848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present paper reviews and resumes the \\\"panoply\\\" of criticism triggered by Ray Kurzweil's worrying scenario about the forthcoming Technological Singularity. These debates on technological evolution are re-considered and re-evaluated from the perspective of philosophical anthropology. Genuine enquiries on this subject are taken up as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference: Laval Virtual\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference: Laval Virtual\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2466816.2466848\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference: Laval Virtual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2466816.2466848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文回顾并恢复了Ray Kurzweil关于即将到来的技术奇点的令人担忧的场景所引发的批评。这些关于技术进化的争论从哲学人类学的角度被重新思考和重新评价。关于这个问题的真正的询问也被采纳了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pro and cons singularity: Kurzweil's theory and its critics
The present paper reviews and resumes the "panoply" of criticism triggered by Ray Kurzweil's worrying scenario about the forthcoming Technological Singularity. These debates on technological evolution are re-considered and re-evaluated from the perspective of philosophical anthropology. Genuine enquiries on this subject are taken up as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信