历史在继续:福山关于历史终结论的思考

Sabri Kiçmari
{"title":"历史在继续:福山关于历史终结论的思考","authors":"Sabri Kiçmari","doi":"10.12778/235108617X15452339029536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fukuyama's thesis about \"the end of history\" is controversial. History is not an ideology. History cannot be ended, if by history we mean the past, which we remember and interpret for the purpose of orientating ourselves in the present and the future. Fukuyama has a right to declare the victory of liberal democracy, but other political ideologies have not become extinct. If we look at the thesis of the \"end of history\" from a scientific point of view, then we can conclude that such a thing is impossible: for after the \"end of history\", history continues. Therefore, there is no real end to history. It is continuing a quarter of a century after the Fukyama's thesis was published. Even if we can accept the thesis of the end of history as an ideology, we still cannot accept the end of philosophy. Phenomenology, Critical Realism, Existentialist Philosophy, Hermeneutics, Structuralism etc. are just some of the evidence that contemporary philosophy continues to exist and evolve, despite the rising and falling of various ideologies in the 20th century and the early 21st century. This can also be said about art, culture and history as a science.","PeriodicalId":258423,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Theorizing Politics & Power (Political) (Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The History Continues: Reflections About the Theory of the End of History from Francis Fukuyama\",\"authors\":\"Sabri Kiçmari\",\"doi\":\"10.12778/235108617X15452339029536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fukuyama's thesis about \\\"the end of history\\\" is controversial. History is not an ideology. History cannot be ended, if by history we mean the past, which we remember and interpret for the purpose of orientating ourselves in the present and the future. Fukuyama has a right to declare the victory of liberal democracy, but other political ideologies have not become extinct. If we look at the thesis of the \\\"end of history\\\" from a scientific point of view, then we can conclude that such a thing is impossible: for after the \\\"end of history\\\", history continues. Therefore, there is no real end to history. It is continuing a quarter of a century after the Fukyama's thesis was published. Even if we can accept the thesis of the end of history as an ideology, we still cannot accept the end of philosophy. Phenomenology, Critical Realism, Existentialist Philosophy, Hermeneutics, Structuralism etc. are just some of the evidence that contemporary philosophy continues to exist and evolve, despite the rising and falling of various ideologies in the 20th century and the early 21st century. This can also be said about art, culture and history as a science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AARN: Theorizing Politics & Power (Political) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AARN: Theorizing Politics & Power (Political) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12778/235108617X15452339029536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Theorizing Politics & Power (Political) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12778/235108617X15452339029536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

福山关于“历史的终结”的论点是有争议的。历史不是一种意识形态。如果我们所说的历史指的是过去,那么历史是不可能结束的,我们对过去的记忆和解释是为了在现在和未来中定位自己。福山有权利宣布自由民主主义的胜利,但其他政治意识形态并没有灭绝。如果我们从科学的角度来看“历史的终结”这个命题,那么我们可以得出这样的结论:这样的事情是不可能的:因为在“历史的终结”之后,历史还在继续。因此,历史没有真正的终结。在福山的论文发表25年后,这种现象仍在继续。即使我们可以接受历史终结论作为一种意识形态,我们仍然不能接受哲学终结论。现象学、批判现实主义、存在主义哲学、解释学、结构主义等只是当代哲学继续存在和发展的一些证据,尽管各种意识形态在20世纪和21世纪初起起落落。这也可以说是艺术、文化和历史作为一门科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The History Continues: Reflections About the Theory of the End of History from Francis Fukuyama
Fukuyama's thesis about "the end of history" is controversial. History is not an ideology. History cannot be ended, if by history we mean the past, which we remember and interpret for the purpose of orientating ourselves in the present and the future. Fukuyama has a right to declare the victory of liberal democracy, but other political ideologies have not become extinct. If we look at the thesis of the "end of history" from a scientific point of view, then we can conclude that such a thing is impossible: for after the "end of history", history continues. Therefore, there is no real end to history. It is continuing a quarter of a century after the Fukyama's thesis was published. Even if we can accept the thesis of the end of history as an ideology, we still cannot accept the end of philosophy. Phenomenology, Critical Realism, Existentialist Philosophy, Hermeneutics, Structuralism etc. are just some of the evidence that contemporary philosophy continues to exist and evolve, despite the rising and falling of various ideologies in the 20th century and the early 21st century. This can also be said about art, culture and history as a science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信