曲线特征提取的评价方法

2009 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR 2009) Pub Date : 2009-10-01 DOI:10.1109/AIPR.2009.5466322

Peter Doucette, Ann Martin, Chris Kavanagh, Tim McIntyre, Steven Barton, J. Grodecki, S. Malitz, Matthew Tang, J. Nolting

{"title":"曲线特征提取的评价方法","authors":"Peter Doucette, Ann Martin, Chris Kavanagh, Tim McIntyre, Steven Barton, J. Grodecki, S. Malitz, Matthew Tang, J. Nolting","doi":"10.1109/AIPR.2009.5466322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of quantitative performance evaluation methods can provide useful insights in determining the utility of computer-assisted methods for delineating geographic features from remotely sensed images. Evaluation concepts are demonstrated with road centerlines in particular, but are applicable to similar feature types such as paths, trails, or rivers. The two comparative measures used to differentiate conventional versus computer-assisted delineation are 1) user clock time, and 2) spatial consistency. Our evaluation results with road centerlines demonstrate how such quantitative analyses can be used to determine the utility of computer-assisted methods from both developmental and operational perspectives.","PeriodicalId":266025,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR 2009)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation methods for curvilinear feature extraction\",\"authors\":\"Peter Doucette, Ann Martin, Chris Kavanagh, Tim McIntyre, Steven Barton, J. Grodecki, S. Malitz, Matthew Tang, J. Nolting\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AIPR.2009.5466322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The application of quantitative performance evaluation methods can provide useful insights in determining the utility of computer-assisted methods for delineating geographic features from remotely sensed images. Evaluation concepts are demonstrated with road centerlines in particular, but are applicable to similar feature types such as paths, trails, or rivers. The two comparative measures used to differentiate conventional versus computer-assisted delineation are 1) user clock time, and 2) spatial consistency. Our evaluation results with road centerlines demonstrate how such quantitative analyses can be used to determine the utility of computer-assisted methods from both developmental and operational perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":266025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR 2009)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR 2009)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIPR.2009.5466322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR 2009)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIPR.2009.5466322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

定量性能评估方法的应用可以为确定从遥感图像中描绘地理特征的计算机辅助方法的效用提供有用的见解。评估概念特别以道路中心线为例，但也适用于类似的特征类型，如路径、小径或河流。用于区分传统和计算机辅助描绘的两个比较指标是:1)用户时钟时间和2)空间一致性。我们对道路中心线的评估结果表明，从发展和运营的角度来看，如何使用这种定量分析来确定计算机辅助方法的效用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evaluation methods for curvilinear feature extraction

The application of quantitative performance evaluation methods can provide useful insights in determining the utility of computer-assisted methods for delineating geographic features from remotely sensed images. Evaluation concepts are demonstrated with road centerlines in particular, but are applicable to similar feature types such as paths, trails, or rivers. The two comparative measures used to differentiate conventional versus computer-assisted delineation are 1) user clock time, and 2) spatial consistency. Our evaluation results with road centerlines demonstrate how such quantitative analyses can be used to determine the utility of computer-assisted methods from both developmental and operational perspectives.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2009 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR 2009)

自引率

0.00%

发文量