面向通用模式关系提取的组合矩阵和张量分解

VS@HLT-NAACL Pub Date : 2015-06-01 DOI:10.3115/v1/W15-1519
Sameer Singh, Tim Rocktäschel, S. Riedel
{"title":"面向通用模式关系提取的组合矩阵和张量分解","authors":"Sameer Singh, Tim Rocktäschel, S. Riedel","doi":"10.3115/v1/W15-1519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Matrix factorization of knowledge bases in universal schema has facilitated accurate distantlysupervised relation extraction. This factorization encodes dependencies between textual patterns and structured relations using lowdimensional vectors defined for each entity pair; although these factors are effective at combining evidence for an entity pair, they are inaccurate on rare pairs, or for relations that depend crucially on the entity types. On the other hand, tensor factorization is able to overcome these shortcomings when applied to link prediction by maintaining entity-wise factors. However these models have been unsuitable for universal schema. In this paper we first present an illustration on synthetic data that explains the unsuitability of tensor factorization to relation extraction with universal schemas. Since the benefits of tensor and matrix factorization are complementary, we then investigate two hybrid methods that combine the benefits of the two paradigms. We show that the combination can be fruitful: we handle ambiguously phrased relations, achieve gains in accuracy on real-world relations, and demonstrate that entity embeddings encode entity types.","PeriodicalId":299646,"journal":{"name":"VS@HLT-NAACL","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Combined Matrix and Tensor Factorization for Universal Schema Relation Extraction\",\"authors\":\"Sameer Singh, Tim Rocktäschel, S. Riedel\",\"doi\":\"10.3115/v1/W15-1519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Matrix factorization of knowledge bases in universal schema has facilitated accurate distantlysupervised relation extraction. This factorization encodes dependencies between textual patterns and structured relations using lowdimensional vectors defined for each entity pair; although these factors are effective at combining evidence for an entity pair, they are inaccurate on rare pairs, or for relations that depend crucially on the entity types. On the other hand, tensor factorization is able to overcome these shortcomings when applied to link prediction by maintaining entity-wise factors. However these models have been unsuitable for universal schema. In this paper we first present an illustration on synthetic data that explains the unsuitability of tensor factorization to relation extraction with universal schemas. Since the benefits of tensor and matrix factorization are complementary, we then investigate two hybrid methods that combine the benefits of the two paradigms. We show that the combination can be fruitful: we handle ambiguously phrased relations, achieve gains in accuracy on real-world relations, and demonstrate that entity embeddings encode entity types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VS@HLT-NAACL\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VS@HLT-NAACL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W15-1519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VS@HLT-NAACL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W15-1519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

通用模式中知识库的矩阵分解有助于精确的远程监督关系提取。这种分解使用为每个实体对定义的低维向量编码文本模式和结构化关系之间的依赖关系;尽管这些因素在组合实体对的证据方面是有效的,但对于稀有对或关键依赖于实体类型的关系,它们是不准确的。另一方面,张量分解可以通过保持实体因子来克服这些缺点。然而,这些模型并不适合通用模式。在本文中,我们首先给出了一个合成数据的例子,解释了张量分解在通用模式下关系提取中的不适用性。由于张量分解和矩阵分解的优点是互补的,因此我们研究了结合两种范式优点的两种混合方法。我们证明了这种组合是有成效的:我们处理了措辞含糊的关系,在现实世界的关系上获得了准确性的提高,并证明了实体嵌入对实体类型进行编码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards Combined Matrix and Tensor Factorization for Universal Schema Relation Extraction
Matrix factorization of knowledge bases in universal schema has facilitated accurate distantlysupervised relation extraction. This factorization encodes dependencies between textual patterns and structured relations using lowdimensional vectors defined for each entity pair; although these factors are effective at combining evidence for an entity pair, they are inaccurate on rare pairs, or for relations that depend crucially on the entity types. On the other hand, tensor factorization is able to overcome these shortcomings when applied to link prediction by maintaining entity-wise factors. However these models have been unsuitable for universal schema. In this paper we first present an illustration on synthetic data that explains the unsuitability of tensor factorization to relation extraction with universal schemas. Since the benefits of tensor and matrix factorization are complementary, we then investigate two hybrid methods that combine the benefits of the two paradigms. We show that the combination can be fruitful: we handle ambiguously phrased relations, achieve gains in accuracy on real-world relations, and demonstrate that entity embeddings encode entity types.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信