{"title":"土耳其语版护理博士教育质量评估工具的效度和信度","authors":"Ayla Bayık Temel, Aynur Uysal Toraman, Gulengul Mermer, Ebru Konal, Esin Ateş","doi":"10.5961/higheredusci.1078501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Quality of Doctoral Education in Nursing \n(QNDE) scale. The lack of a measurement tool examining the quality of doctoral education in nursing in a national context is the reason for \nthis study. Data were collected from 55 teaching staff and 225 doctorate students. Explanatory and confirmatory factor analyzes were used \nfor test validity. Cronbach’s α coefficient of reliability, independent-sample t test, and test-retest analysis were calculated to test Reliability. \nThe factor loads ranged between 0.51-0.91.The construct validity was good (χ2/df =3.02; RMSEA = 0.085; CFI = 0.87; NFI = 0.90; GFI \n= 0.79; TLI = 0.90; IFI =0.91; p < 0.001). The Cronbach alpha value of the scale was 0.94. The results of this study show that the Turkish \nversion of the Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education instrument is a valid and reliable tool.","PeriodicalId":119364,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education and Science","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Instrument of the Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education\",\"authors\":\"Ayla Bayık Temel, Aynur Uysal Toraman, Gulengul Mermer, Ebru Konal, Esin Ateş\",\"doi\":\"10.5961/higheredusci.1078501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Quality of Doctoral Education in Nursing \\n(QNDE) scale. The lack of a measurement tool examining the quality of doctoral education in nursing in a national context is the reason for \\nthis study. Data were collected from 55 teaching staff and 225 doctorate students. Explanatory and confirmatory factor analyzes were used \\nfor test validity. Cronbach’s α coefficient of reliability, independent-sample t test, and test-retest analysis were calculated to test Reliability. \\nThe factor loads ranged between 0.51-0.91.The construct validity was good (χ2/df =3.02; RMSEA = 0.085; CFI = 0.87; NFI = 0.90; GFI \\n= 0.79; TLI = 0.90; IFI =0.91; p < 0.001). The Cronbach alpha value of the scale was 0.94. The results of this study show that the Turkish \\nversion of the Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education instrument is a valid and reliable tool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Higher Education and Science\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Higher Education and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1078501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1078501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Instrument of the Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education
The aim of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Quality of Doctoral Education in Nursing
(QNDE) scale. The lack of a measurement tool examining the quality of doctoral education in nursing in a national context is the reason for
this study. Data were collected from 55 teaching staff and 225 doctorate students. Explanatory and confirmatory factor analyzes were used
for test validity. Cronbach’s α coefficient of reliability, independent-sample t test, and test-retest analysis were calculated to test Reliability.
The factor loads ranged between 0.51-0.91.The construct validity was good (χ2/df =3.02; RMSEA = 0.085; CFI = 0.87; NFI = 0.90; GFI
= 0.79; TLI = 0.90; IFI =0.91; p < 0.001). The Cronbach alpha value of the scale was 0.94. The results of this study show that the Turkish
version of the Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education instrument is a valid and reliable tool.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
