{"title":"真理的对话理论大纲","authors":"Miguel Álvarez Lisboa","doi":"10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2023.1422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay I propose two theories of truth and show how they deal with semantic paradoxes. Their most salient feature is that they are based on a gametheoretic understanding of logic and meaning. “Truth”, therefore, is understood dialogically, as agreement between parts. I compare this proposal with a similar one already existing in the literature —Dutilh Novaes and French 2018—, and highlight the advantages of mine. The theories of truth I present are non-trivial, substructural (in a sense to be clarified) and capture strong intuitions about truth. Some philosophical recommendations in favor of our understanding of Dialogics are delivered along the way.","PeriodicalId":117174,"journal":{"name":"Crítica (México D. F. En línea)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outline of a Dialogical Theory of Truth\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Álvarez Lisboa\",\"doi\":\"10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2023.1422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this essay I propose two theories of truth and show how they deal with semantic paradoxes. Their most salient feature is that they are based on a gametheoretic understanding of logic and meaning. “Truth”, therefore, is understood dialogically, as agreement between parts. I compare this proposal with a similar one already existing in the literature —Dutilh Novaes and French 2018—, and highlight the advantages of mine. The theories of truth I present are non-trivial, substructural (in a sense to be clarified) and capture strong intuitions about truth. Some philosophical recommendations in favor of our understanding of Dialogics are delivered along the way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crítica (México D. F. En línea)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crítica (México D. F. En línea)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2023.1422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crítica (México D. F. En línea)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2023.1422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇文章中,我提出了两种真理理论,并展示了它们是如何处理语义悖论的。它们最显著的特点是基于对逻辑和意义的博弈论理解。“真理”,因此,被理解为对话,作为部分之间的协议。我将此提案与文献中已经存在的类似提案(dutilh Novaes and French 2018)进行了比较,并强调了我的优势。我所提出的真理理论是非平凡的、次结构的(在某种意义上有待澄清),并抓住了关于真理的强烈直觉。在此过程中,我们提出了一些有利于我们理解对话的哲学建议。
In this essay I propose two theories of truth and show how they deal with semantic paradoxes. Their most salient feature is that they are based on a gametheoretic understanding of logic and meaning. “Truth”, therefore, is understood dialogically, as agreement between parts. I compare this proposal with a similar one already existing in the literature —Dutilh Novaes and French 2018—, and highlight the advantages of mine. The theories of truth I present are non-trivial, substructural (in a sense to be clarified) and capture strong intuitions about truth. Some philosophical recommendations in favor of our understanding of Dialogics are delivered along the way.