掷球策略在四年级SDN 023《潘多查亚》词汇教学中的效果

Sudarmiati Sudarmiati
{"title":"掷球策略在四年级SDN 023《潘多查亚》词汇教学中的效果","authors":"Sudarmiati Sudarmiati","doi":"10.37301/elect.v1i1.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to find out there was significant effect of the students who were taught by using ball toss strategy better than the students who were not taught on vocabulary mastery at the fourth grade of SDN 023 Pandau Jaya. This research was Quasi Experimental research. The population of this research was the the fourth grade of SDN 023 Pandau Jaya. The number of sample was 56 students; Experimental class was IV.A consisting of 28 students, and Control class was IV.C consisting of 28 students. After calculating U-Mann whitney test, the researcher found that Asymp.Sig 2 tailed < Significant level (0.00 < 0.05), so that Alternative Hypothesis was accepted, it meant that there was significant effect of using Ball Toss Strategy toward students’ vocabulary mastery at the fourth grade of SDN 023 Pandau Jaya and the average post-test score of experimental class was 71.42, increased from pre-test score 54.10. The average post-test on control class was 63.57 was lower than Experimental class. N-Gain of this research was 0.35, it was categorized middle. As the conclusion, there was different vocabulary mastery of the students who received in class instruction of ball toss strategy than students who did not receive instruction of ball toss strategy.\n \nREFERENCES\nAefsky, Fern. 2000. Making decision about diverse learners. United States. Handbooks, manuals.\nAllen, Janet. 1999. Word and Word in teaching Vocabulary in Grade 4-12. Portland: Stelhouse Publishers.\nAlicia.  2010. Teaching Vocabulary by Using Ball Toss Review Strategy at Elementary School 144 Padang. Retrieved on April 2014. http://ejournal-s1.stkip-pgri-sumbar.ac.id/index.php/Inggris/article/view/737/728\nAsfiyah. 2011. The Use of Ball Toss Strategy to Improve Students Vocabulary in Concrete Noun (An Experimental Research at the Second Grade of MTS. Mafatihut Thullab An-Nawawy Surodadi Jepara in Academic Year of 2010/2011. Retrieved on April 2014. Unpublished Thesis: http://library. walisongo.ac.id/digilib/files/disk1/115/jtptiain-gdl-asfiyah-5707-1-053411341.pdf\nCreswell, Jhon W, 2005. Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Second Edition. USA: University of Nebraska-Linclon.\nEckersley, C.E. 1960. A Comprehensive English Grammar for Foreign Language Students. London: Longman.\nHasanah. 2013. Teaching English Vocabulary Using Ball Toss Strategy at the Fourth Grade Students of SDN Cibeber Mandiri 1 Cimahi in Academic Year 2012-2013.Retrieved on April 2014. Unpublished thesis: http://publikasi.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/wp-content/blogs.dir/2 /files/ 2013/11 /0922055567-Hasanah.\nHornby, AS.2000. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford university Press.\nKhaty. 2010. 40 active strategy learningstrategies inclusive Classroom. United States. Lybrary of congres catalog.\nLeaver,et al.2005. Achieving Success in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge  University Press.\nLinse, Caroline. 2006. Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners. NewYork: McGraw Hill.\nMeltzer,D.E. 2002. The relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physic: A possible: “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest score. American Journal.\nNunan, David. 1991. Practical English Language. America: Cambridge University Press.\nSeptiani. 2013. Teaching Vocabulary Using Ball Toss Strategy on Students of Elementary (A Case Study at the Sixth Grade SD Pandu Bandung. Retrieved on April 2014. Unpublished thesis: http://publikasi.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/wp-content/blogs.dir/2/files/2013/11/09220536-Septiani.\nSugiyono, Prof.Dr. 2010. Statiska Untuk Penelitian. Bandung. CV.Alfabeta\nToby. 2002. Strategies for teaching. San Francisco: Market Strevrt.\nUr, Penny. 1991. A Course in Language Teaching: Practiceand Theory. Cambridge University Press.\nZulkarnain. 2010. Statiska Penelitian. Pekanbaru: Cendekia Insani Pekanbaru.","PeriodicalId":291847,"journal":{"name":"English Language Education and Current Trends (ELECT)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF USING BALL TOSS STRATEGY IN TEACHING VOCABULARY AT THE FOURTH GRADE OF SDN 023 PANDAU JAYA\",\"authors\":\"Sudarmiati Sudarmiati\",\"doi\":\"10.37301/elect.v1i1.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this research was to find out there was significant effect of the students who were taught by using ball toss strategy better than the students who were not taught on vocabulary mastery at the fourth grade of SDN 023 Pandau Jaya. This research was Quasi Experimental research. The population of this research was the the fourth grade of SDN 023 Pandau Jaya. The number of sample was 56 students; Experimental class was IV.A consisting of 28 students, and Control class was IV.C consisting of 28 students. After calculating U-Mann whitney test, the researcher found that Asymp.Sig 2 tailed < Significant level (0.00 < 0.05), so that Alternative Hypothesis was accepted, it meant that there was significant effect of using Ball Toss Strategy toward students’ vocabulary mastery at the fourth grade of SDN 023 Pandau Jaya and the average post-test score of experimental class was 71.42, increased from pre-test score 54.10. The average post-test on control class was 63.57 was lower than Experimental class. N-Gain of this research was 0.35, it was categorized middle. As the conclusion, there was different vocabulary mastery of the students who received in class instruction of ball toss strategy than students who did not receive instruction of ball toss strategy.\\n \\nREFERENCES\\nAefsky, Fern. 2000. Making decision about diverse learners. United States. Handbooks, manuals.\\nAllen, Janet. 1999. Word and Word in teaching Vocabulary in Grade 4-12. Portland: Stelhouse Publishers.\\nAlicia.  2010. Teaching Vocabulary by Using Ball Toss Review Strategy at Elementary School 144 Padang. Retrieved on April 2014. http://ejournal-s1.stkip-pgri-sumbar.ac.id/index.php/Inggris/article/view/737/728\\nAsfiyah. 2011. The Use of Ball Toss Strategy to Improve Students Vocabulary in Concrete Noun (An Experimental Research at the Second Grade of MTS. Mafatihut Thullab An-Nawawy Surodadi Jepara in Academic Year of 2010/2011. Retrieved on April 2014. Unpublished Thesis: http://library. walisongo.ac.id/digilib/files/disk1/115/jtptiain-gdl-asfiyah-5707-1-053411341.pdf\\nCreswell, Jhon W, 2005. Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Second Edition. USA: University of Nebraska-Linclon.\\nEckersley, C.E. 1960. A Comprehensive English Grammar for Foreign Language Students. London: Longman.\\nHasanah. 2013. Teaching English Vocabulary Using Ball Toss Strategy at the Fourth Grade Students of SDN Cibeber Mandiri 1 Cimahi in Academic Year 2012-2013.Retrieved on April 2014. Unpublished thesis: http://publikasi.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/wp-content/blogs.dir/2 /files/ 2013/11 /0922055567-Hasanah.\\nHornby, AS.2000. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford university Press.\\nKhaty. 2010. 40 active strategy learningstrategies inclusive Classroom. United States. Lybrary of congres catalog.\\nLeaver,et al.2005. Achieving Success in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge  University Press.\\nLinse, Caroline. 2006. Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners. NewYork: McGraw Hill.\\nMeltzer,D.E. 2002. The relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physic: A possible: “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest score. American Journal.\\nNunan, David. 1991. Practical English Language. America: Cambridge University Press.\\nSeptiani. 2013. Teaching Vocabulary Using Ball Toss Strategy on Students of Elementary (A Case Study at the Sixth Grade SD Pandu Bandung. Retrieved on April 2014. Unpublished thesis: http://publikasi.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/wp-content/blogs.dir/2/files/2013/11/09220536-Septiani.\\nSugiyono, Prof.Dr. 2010. Statiska Untuk Penelitian. Bandung. CV.Alfabeta\\nToby. 2002. Strategies for teaching. San Francisco: Market Strevrt.\\nUr, Penny. 1991. A Course in Language Teaching: Practiceand Theory. Cambridge University Press.\\nZulkarnain. 2010. Statiska Penelitian. Pekanbaru: Cendekia Insani Pekanbaru.\",\"PeriodicalId\":291847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English Language Education and Current Trends (ELECT)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English Language Education and Current Trends (ELECT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37301/elect.v1i1.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Language Education and Current Trends (ELECT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37301/elect.v1i1.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是发现在SDN 023 Pandau Jaya的四年级词汇掌握上,使用掷球策略教学的学生比未使用掷球策略教学的学生有显著的效果。这项研究是准实验研究。本研究的人群为Pandau Jaya SDN 023的四年级。样本人数为56名学生;实验班为IV.A班,28人;控制班为IV.C班,28人。在计算U-Mann whitney检验后,研究者发现渐进线sig 2小于<显著水平(0.00 < 0.05),因此接受备择假设,即掷球策略对SDN 023 Pandau Jaya四年级学生的词汇掌握有显著影响,实验班的平均后测分数为71.42,高于前测分数54.10。对照班的后测平均分为63.57分,低于实验班。本研究N-Gain为0.35,属于中等。综上所述,接受抛球策略课堂教学的学生与未接受抛球策略课堂教学的学生在词汇掌握方面存在差异。参考文献:芬·艾夫斯基,2000。为不同的学习者做决定。美国。手册,手册。珍妮特·艾伦,1999。4-12年级词汇教学中的词与词。波特兰:Stelhouse出版社。2010. 掷球复习策略在144巴东小学词汇教学中的应用。检索于2014年4月。http://ejournal-s1.stkip-pgri-sumbar.ac.id/index.php/Inggris/article/view/737/728Asfiyah。2011. 掷球策略对提高学生具体名词词汇量的作用(MTS二年级实验研究)检索于2014年4月。未发表论文:http://library。walisongo.ac.id digilib /文件/ disk1/115 jtptiain - gdl - asfiyah - 5707 - 1 - 053411341。pdfCreswell, john W, 2005。教育研究计划,实施和评估定量和定性研究。第二版。美国:内布拉斯加大学林肯分校。埃克斯利(1960年)《外语学生综合英语语法》。伦敦:Longman.Hasanah。2013. 2012-2013学年SDN Cibeber Mandiri 1 Cimahi四年级学生用抛球策略教学英语词汇检索于2014年4月。未发表论文:http://publikasi.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/wp-content/blogs.dir/2 /files/ 2013/11 /0922055567-Hasanah。霍恩比,AS.2000。牛津高级学习者词典。牛津大学出版社,谢谢。2010. 40主动策略学习策略包容课堂。美国。国会图书馆目录。离开者,et al.2005。第二语言习得的成功。剑桥大学出版社。林瑟,卡罗琳。2006。实用英语教学:青少年学习者。纽约:McGraw Hill.Meltzer,D.E.2002. 数学准备与物理概念学习增益之间的关系:诊断前测试分数中可能存在的“隐藏变量”。美国的杂志。David Nunan, 1991。实用英语。美国:剑桥大学出版社。2013. 掷球策略在小学生词汇教学中的应用(以小学六年级学生为例)检索于2014年4月。未发表论文:http://publikasi.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/wp-content/blogs.dir/2/files/2013/11/09220536-Septiani.Sugiyono,教授,博士。2010. Statiska Untuk Penelitian。万隆。CV.AlfabetaToby。2002. 教学策略。旧金山:市场街。呃,Penny, 1991年。语言教学课程:实践与理论。剑桥大学出版社。2010. Statiska Penelitian。北坎巴鲁:Cendekia Insani北坎巴鲁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE EFFECT OF USING BALL TOSS STRATEGY IN TEACHING VOCABULARY AT THE FOURTH GRADE OF SDN 023 PANDAU JAYA
The purpose of this research was to find out there was significant effect of the students who were taught by using ball toss strategy better than the students who were not taught on vocabulary mastery at the fourth grade of SDN 023 Pandau Jaya. This research was Quasi Experimental research. The population of this research was the the fourth grade of SDN 023 Pandau Jaya. The number of sample was 56 students; Experimental class was IV.A consisting of 28 students, and Control class was IV.C consisting of 28 students. After calculating U-Mann whitney test, the researcher found that Asymp.Sig 2 tailed < Significant level (0.00 < 0.05), so that Alternative Hypothesis was accepted, it meant that there was significant effect of using Ball Toss Strategy toward students’ vocabulary mastery at the fourth grade of SDN 023 Pandau Jaya and the average post-test score of experimental class was 71.42, increased from pre-test score 54.10. The average post-test on control class was 63.57 was lower than Experimental class. N-Gain of this research was 0.35, it was categorized middle. As the conclusion, there was different vocabulary mastery of the students who received in class instruction of ball toss strategy than students who did not receive instruction of ball toss strategy.   REFERENCES Aefsky, Fern. 2000. Making decision about diverse learners. United States. Handbooks, manuals. Allen, Janet. 1999. Word and Word in teaching Vocabulary in Grade 4-12. Portland: Stelhouse Publishers. Alicia.  2010. Teaching Vocabulary by Using Ball Toss Review Strategy at Elementary School 144 Padang. Retrieved on April 2014. http://ejournal-s1.stkip-pgri-sumbar.ac.id/index.php/Inggris/article/view/737/728 Asfiyah. 2011. The Use of Ball Toss Strategy to Improve Students Vocabulary in Concrete Noun (An Experimental Research at the Second Grade of MTS. Mafatihut Thullab An-Nawawy Surodadi Jepara in Academic Year of 2010/2011. Retrieved on April 2014. Unpublished Thesis: http://library. walisongo.ac.id/digilib/files/disk1/115/jtptiain-gdl-asfiyah-5707-1-053411341.pdf Creswell, Jhon W, 2005. Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Second Edition. USA: University of Nebraska-Linclon. Eckersley, C.E. 1960. A Comprehensive English Grammar for Foreign Language Students. London: Longman. Hasanah. 2013. Teaching English Vocabulary Using Ball Toss Strategy at the Fourth Grade Students of SDN Cibeber Mandiri 1 Cimahi in Academic Year 2012-2013.Retrieved on April 2014. Unpublished thesis: http://publikasi.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/wp-content/blogs.dir/2 /files/ 2013/11 /0922055567-Hasanah. Hornby, AS.2000. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford university Press. Khaty. 2010. 40 active strategy learningstrategies inclusive Classroom. United States. Lybrary of congres catalog. Leaver,et al.2005. Achieving Success in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge  University Press. Linse, Caroline. 2006. Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners. NewYork: McGraw Hill. Meltzer,D.E. 2002. The relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physic: A possible: “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest score. American Journal. Nunan, David. 1991. Practical English Language. America: Cambridge University Press. Septiani. 2013. Teaching Vocabulary Using Ball Toss Strategy on Students of Elementary (A Case Study at the Sixth Grade SD Pandu Bandung. Retrieved on April 2014. Unpublished thesis: http://publikasi.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/wp-content/blogs.dir/2/files/2013/11/09220536-Septiani. Sugiyono, Prof.Dr. 2010. Statiska Untuk Penelitian. Bandung. CV.Alfabeta Toby. 2002. Strategies for teaching. San Francisco: Market Strevrt. Ur, Penny. 1991. A Course in Language Teaching: Practiceand Theory. Cambridge University Press. Zulkarnain. 2010. Statiska Penelitian. Pekanbaru: Cendekia Insani Pekanbaru.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信