Facebook上的谣言验证:点赞、评论、分享的点击语音

A. Chua, Snehasish Banerjee
{"title":"Facebook上的谣言验证:点赞、评论、分享的点击语音","authors":"A. Chua, Snehasish Banerjee","doi":"10.1109/ICDIM.2017.8244642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to answer the following research question: How do users of social networking sites react to rumor verifications? Rumor verifications refer to messages posted by Snopes, a website dedicated to verify rumors, to confirm the veracity of rumors as either true or false. Data were collected from Snopes' Facebook Fan Page. Users' reactions to rumor verifications on Facebook were examined through their click speech in the form of Likes, Comments and Shares. Users' reactions were studied as a function of two factors: rumor type (wish, dread or neutral), and verification verdict (true or false). Data analyses involved both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Results indicated that users' click speech of Likes and Shares differed significantly with respect to rumor type and verification verdict. Comments were found to contain personal opinion, emotive expression, and call-to-action. Based on these results, the paper offers four implications. It also points to a number of directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":144953,"journal":{"name":"2017 Twelfth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rumor verifications on Facebook: Click speech of likes, comments and shares\",\"authors\":\"A. Chua, Snehasish Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDIM.2017.8244642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper seeks to answer the following research question: How do users of social networking sites react to rumor verifications? Rumor verifications refer to messages posted by Snopes, a website dedicated to verify rumors, to confirm the veracity of rumors as either true or false. Data were collected from Snopes' Facebook Fan Page. Users' reactions to rumor verifications on Facebook were examined through their click speech in the form of Likes, Comments and Shares. Users' reactions were studied as a function of two factors: rumor type (wish, dread or neutral), and verification verdict (true or false). Data analyses involved both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Results indicated that users' click speech of Likes and Shares differed significantly with respect to rumor type and verification verdict. Comments were found to contain personal opinion, emotive expression, and call-to-action. Based on these results, the paper offers four implications. It also points to a number of directions for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Twelfth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM)\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Twelfth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2017.8244642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Twelfth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2017.8244642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文试图回答以下研究问题:社交网站用户对谣言验证的反应如何?“谣言验证”指的是专门验证谣言的网站“Snopes”为确认谣言的真假而发布的信息。数据收集自Snopes的Facebook粉丝页面。用户对Facebook上的谣言验证的反应通过他们的点赞、评论和分享形式的点击语音来检测。用户的反应被研究为两个因素的函数:谣言类型(希望、恐惧或中立)和验证结论(真实或虚假)。数据分析包括定量和定性两种方法。结果表明,用户点赞和分享的点击言语在谣言类型和验证结论上存在显著差异。评论包含个人观点、情感表达和行动呼吁。基于这些结果,本文提出了四个启示。它还指出了未来研究的一些方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rumor verifications on Facebook: Click speech of likes, comments and shares
This paper seeks to answer the following research question: How do users of social networking sites react to rumor verifications? Rumor verifications refer to messages posted by Snopes, a website dedicated to verify rumors, to confirm the veracity of rumors as either true or false. Data were collected from Snopes' Facebook Fan Page. Users' reactions to rumor verifications on Facebook were examined through their click speech in the form of Likes, Comments and Shares. Users' reactions were studied as a function of two factors: rumor type (wish, dread or neutral), and verification verdict (true or false). Data analyses involved both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Results indicated that users' click speech of Likes and Shares differed significantly with respect to rumor type and verification verdict. Comments were found to contain personal opinion, emotive expression, and call-to-action. Based on these results, the paper offers four implications. It also points to a number of directions for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信