哥斯达黎加2005年全国选举结果

R. Valle
{"title":"哥斯达黎加2005年全国选举结果","authors":"R. Valle","doi":"10.29654/TJD.200607.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes the closely fought national election campaign in Costa Rica in 2005. The author describes the role of the Supreme Electoral Court (TSE) and the unprecedented fact that only 88.8 percent of polling stations reported their results to the TSE electronically and that in the results that were reported electronically to the TSE, there was a difference of only 0.3 percent (3,250) votes between the National Liberal Party (PLN) and the Social Christian Unity Party (PUSC). This led to a manual count, giving the PLN a 16,000-vote lead, which the Citizen Action Party (PAC) refused to accept. During the counting period, the PAC presented 695 annulment requests to the TSE, and demanded that the votes of the first 703 polling stations-those which had failed to send in their count by electronic mail-should be recounted. In the end, the TSE rejected the challenges posed by the PAC, and officially declared Oscar Arias Sanchez president-elect on March 7. The author explains how public opinion polls also played a particularly relevant role in this campaign, because all the polls undertaken from the beginning of 2005 predicted a wide margin for the PLN candidate. He also observes that the high rate of abstention was notable, as was the key role played by civil-society organizations, which were clearly in favor of the PAC and acted to the detriment of the PLN.","PeriodicalId":403398,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan journal of democracy","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 2005 National Election Results in Costa Rica\",\"authors\":\"R. Valle\",\"doi\":\"10.29654/TJD.200607.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article describes the closely fought national election campaign in Costa Rica in 2005. The author describes the role of the Supreme Electoral Court (TSE) and the unprecedented fact that only 88.8 percent of polling stations reported their results to the TSE electronically and that in the results that were reported electronically to the TSE, there was a difference of only 0.3 percent (3,250) votes between the National Liberal Party (PLN) and the Social Christian Unity Party (PUSC). This led to a manual count, giving the PLN a 16,000-vote lead, which the Citizen Action Party (PAC) refused to accept. During the counting period, the PAC presented 695 annulment requests to the TSE, and demanded that the votes of the first 703 polling stations-those which had failed to send in their count by electronic mail-should be recounted. In the end, the TSE rejected the challenges posed by the PAC, and officially declared Oscar Arias Sanchez president-elect on March 7. The author explains how public opinion polls also played a particularly relevant role in this campaign, because all the polls undertaken from the beginning of 2005 predicted a wide margin for the PLN candidate. He also observes that the high rate of abstention was notable, as was the key role played by civil-society organizations, which were clearly in favor of the PAC and acted to the detriment of the PLN.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taiwan journal of democracy\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taiwan journal of democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29654/TJD.200607.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan journal of democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29654/TJD.200607.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章描述了2005年哥斯达黎加激烈的全国竞选活动。作者描述了最高选举法院(TSE)的作用,以及一个前所未有的事实,即只有88.8%的投票站以电子方式向TSE报告了他们的结果,而在向TSE报告的电子结果中,民族自由党(PLN)和社会基督教统一党(PUSC)之间的差距仅为0.3%(3,250票)。这导致了人工计票,人民解放军获得了1.6万票的领先优势,而公民行动党(PAC)拒绝接受这一结果。在点票期间,政委会向证券交易所提出了695项取消选举结果的要求,并要求重新点票前703个投票站,即那些没有以电子邮件发送点票结果的投票站。最终,东京证券交易所拒绝了政治行动委员会提出的挑战,并于3月7日正式宣布奥斯卡·阿里亚斯·桑切斯当选总统。作者解释了民意调查如何在这次竞选中发挥了特别重要的作用,因为从2005年初开始进行的所有民意调查都预测人民解放军候选人的优势很大。他还指出,高弃权率是值得注意的,民间社会组织所起的关键作用也是值得注意的,这些组织显然是支持泛非大会的,其行动损害了人民解放运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The 2005 National Election Results in Costa Rica
The article describes the closely fought national election campaign in Costa Rica in 2005. The author describes the role of the Supreme Electoral Court (TSE) and the unprecedented fact that only 88.8 percent of polling stations reported their results to the TSE electronically and that in the results that were reported electronically to the TSE, there was a difference of only 0.3 percent (3,250) votes between the National Liberal Party (PLN) and the Social Christian Unity Party (PUSC). This led to a manual count, giving the PLN a 16,000-vote lead, which the Citizen Action Party (PAC) refused to accept. During the counting period, the PAC presented 695 annulment requests to the TSE, and demanded that the votes of the first 703 polling stations-those which had failed to send in their count by electronic mail-should be recounted. In the end, the TSE rejected the challenges posed by the PAC, and officially declared Oscar Arias Sanchez president-elect on March 7. The author explains how public opinion polls also played a particularly relevant role in this campaign, because all the polls undertaken from the beginning of 2005 predicted a wide margin for the PLN candidate. He also observes that the high rate of abstention was notable, as was the key role played by civil-society organizations, which were clearly in favor of the PAC and acted to the detriment of the PLN.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信