加纳的土地、劳动力和资本:1807-1956年从奴隶到自由劳动力

Benjamin N. Lawrance
{"title":"加纳的土地、劳动力和资本:1807-1956年从奴隶到自由劳动力","authors":"Benjamin N. Lawrance","doi":"10.1353/AFR.2007.0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"as the simple product of European influence. The argument is persuasive, and is certainly in line with much recent Africanist scholarship, but it is worth noting that the material record he has uncovered is by itself probably insufficient to sustain the point. Throughout the work, DeCorse makes considerable and necessary use of the work of historians, though he has not himself examined the original documentary record in a systematic way. That record is extremely large and exists in multiple languages; there is much that the historians whose work he cites have not yet studied, and a fuller examination of the archival documentation might well change our understanding of the historical context within which DeCorse seeks to interpret the archeological data. The author might also have provided more comparative material drawn from historical archaeological investigations elsewhere on the continent to help put the Elmina case in continental perspective. Despite these shortcomings, there is no doubt that DeCorse’s work constitutes a important contribution to the historical literature on Ghana and West Africa.","PeriodicalId":337749,"journal":{"name":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Land, Labor and Capital in Ghana: From Slave to Free Labor in Asante, 1807-1956 (review)\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin N. Lawrance\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/AFR.2007.0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"as the simple product of European influence. The argument is persuasive, and is certainly in line with much recent Africanist scholarship, but it is worth noting that the material record he has uncovered is by itself probably insufficient to sustain the point. Throughout the work, DeCorse makes considerable and necessary use of the work of historians, though he has not himself examined the original documentary record in a systematic way. That record is extremely large and exists in multiple languages; there is much that the historians whose work he cites have not yet studied, and a fuller examination of the archival documentation might well change our understanding of the historical context within which DeCorse seeks to interpret the archeological data. The author might also have provided more comparative material drawn from historical archaeological investigations elsewhere on the continent to help put the Elmina case in continental perspective. Despite these shortcomings, there is no doubt that DeCorse’s work constitutes a important contribution to the historical literature on Ghana and West Africa.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/AFR.2007.0030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/AFR.2007.0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作为欧洲影响的简单产物他的论点很有说服力,而且肯定与最近的许多非洲学者的研究相一致,但值得注意的是,他所发现的材料记录本身可能不足以支持这一观点。在整个作品中,德科斯大量且必要地使用了历史学家的工作,尽管他自己并没有以系统的方式检查原始的文献记录。这个记录非常大,并且以多种语言存在;他引用的历史学家的作品还有很多没有研究过的地方,对档案文件进行更全面的检查很可能会改变我们对历史背景的理解,而德科斯试图在这个背景下解释考古数据。作者还可以提供更多从欧洲大陆其他地方的历史考古调查中获得的比较材料,以帮助从欧洲大陆的角度来看待埃尔米纳事件。尽管存在这些缺点,但毫无疑问,DeCorse的工作对加纳和西非的历史文献做出了重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Land, Labor and Capital in Ghana: From Slave to Free Labor in Asante, 1807-1956 (review)
as the simple product of European influence. The argument is persuasive, and is certainly in line with much recent Africanist scholarship, but it is worth noting that the material record he has uncovered is by itself probably insufficient to sustain the point. Throughout the work, DeCorse makes considerable and necessary use of the work of historians, though he has not himself examined the original documentary record in a systematic way. That record is extremely large and exists in multiple languages; there is much that the historians whose work he cites have not yet studied, and a fuller examination of the archival documentation might well change our understanding of the historical context within which DeCorse seeks to interpret the archeological data. The author might also have provided more comparative material drawn from historical archaeological investigations elsewhere on the continent to help put the Elmina case in continental perspective. Despite these shortcomings, there is no doubt that DeCorse’s work constitutes a important contribution to the historical literature on Ghana and West Africa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信