制度、政治和观念背景在评价公共政策中的重要性

P. Jannuzzi
{"title":"制度、政治和观念背景在评价公共政策中的重要性","authors":"P. Jannuzzi","doi":"10.4322/rbaval202211037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This text proposes that evaluative studies should incorporate, as a step prior to the Evaluation, the Analysis of the Institutional, Political and Ideational Context (CIPI) that surrounds the policy or program in question. The CIPI constitutes a bridge between Analysis and Evaluation, bringing the context in which the proposal and implementation of the policy or program took place, the institutional framework, the main actors involved and the prevailing ideas and values. From a synthesis of the neo-institutionalist models of Public Policy Analysis, it is presented what is and how to carry out the CIPI for a program, bringing the example of the Agua Para Todos program. Assessments in this context would be less supposedly “neutral”, more robust in terms of the consistency of findings and the relevance of eventual recommendations and, above all, more recognizably based on the public values that guided the design of the policy or program. políticas; reportagens na mídia convencional; trends veiculados nas mídias sociais; resultados de pesquisa de opinião pública; artigos em periódicos na área de Ciência Política e Avaliação entrevistas com .","PeriodicalId":285500,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Avaliação","volume":"00 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A importância do contexto institucional, político e ideacional na avaliação de políticas públicas\",\"authors\":\"P. Jannuzzi\",\"doi\":\"10.4322/rbaval202211037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This text proposes that evaluative studies should incorporate, as a step prior to the Evaluation, the Analysis of the Institutional, Political and Ideational Context (CIPI) that surrounds the policy or program in question. The CIPI constitutes a bridge between Analysis and Evaluation, bringing the context in which the proposal and implementation of the policy or program took place, the institutional framework, the main actors involved and the prevailing ideas and values. From a synthesis of the neo-institutionalist models of Public Policy Analysis, it is presented what is and how to carry out the CIPI for a program, bringing the example of the Agua Para Todos program. Assessments in this context would be less supposedly “neutral”, more robust in terms of the consistency of findings and the relevance of eventual recommendations and, above all, more recognizably based on the public values that guided the design of the policy or program. políticas; reportagens na mídia convencional; trends veiculados nas mídias sociais; resultados de pesquisa de opinião pública; artigos em periódicos na área de Ciência Política e Avaliação entrevistas com .\",\"PeriodicalId\":285500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Avaliação\",\"volume\":\"00 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Avaliação\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4322/rbaval202211037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Avaliação","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/rbaval202211037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文建议,作为评估之前的一个步骤,评估研究应纳入围绕所讨论的政策或计划的制度,政治和理念背景(CIPI)的分析。CIPI是分析和评估之间的桥梁,将政策或计划的提出和实施的背景,制度框架,主要参与者以及流行的思想和价值观结合起来。从综合公共政策分析的新制度主义模型出发,以阿瓜帕拉托多斯项目为例,介绍了什么是CIPI项目以及如何实施CIPI项目。在这方面的评估将不那么所谓的“中立”,在调查结果的一致性和最终建议的相关性方面将更加有力,最重要的是,将更加明确地基于指导政策或方案设计的公众价值观。政治;Reportagens na mídia conventional;汽车发展趋势:mídias社会;结果意见分析 o pública;artigos em periódicos na área de Ciência Política e avaliapart o entrevistas com。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A importância do contexto institucional, político e ideacional na avaliação de políticas públicas
This text proposes that evaluative studies should incorporate, as a step prior to the Evaluation, the Analysis of the Institutional, Political and Ideational Context (CIPI) that surrounds the policy or program in question. The CIPI constitutes a bridge between Analysis and Evaluation, bringing the context in which the proposal and implementation of the policy or program took place, the institutional framework, the main actors involved and the prevailing ideas and values. From a synthesis of the neo-institutionalist models of Public Policy Analysis, it is presented what is and how to carry out the CIPI for a program, bringing the example of the Agua Para Todos program. Assessments in this context would be less supposedly “neutral”, more robust in terms of the consistency of findings and the relevance of eventual recommendations and, above all, more recognizably based on the public values that guided the design of the policy or program. políticas; reportagens na mídia convencional; trends veiculados nas mídias sociais; resultados de pesquisa de opinião pública; artigos em periódicos na área de Ciência Política e Avaliação entrevistas com .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信